Talk:HMS Proteus (N29)

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

The French_aviso_Rigault_de_Genouilly is also claimed by HMS_Pandora_(N42) on their respective pages. It can't have been sunk twice, so one of these claims is incorrect. Anyone know which? 164.107.80.208 (talk) 16:37, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rigault de Genouilly

Both the HMS Proteus and HMS Pandora pages claim to have torpedoed and sunk Vichy France' aviso Rigault de Genouilly. 2601:195:C380:1FC0:0:0:0:71E6 (talk) 11:48, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Pandora's page seems to be correct. Both of the sources this page cites in asserting that it was Proteus instead say it was Pandora; I can't find any that claim it for Proteus. OwlEyes00 (talk) 12:18, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]