Jump to content

Talk:ID3 algorithm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 19:41, 3 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Robotics}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

TDIDT?

[edit]

I was searching wikipedia for an article on Top Down Induction of Decision Trees. None seems to exist (in English). I don't necessarily think one should exist, but it should at least redirect to this algorithm which is similar. I'm kinda new to the wikipedia thing so I figured I throw this idea out and let someone who knows the procedure better set something up. 128.84.156.178 (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted Material

[edit]

The algorithm here is word for word taken from the Mitchell book in references. The article does not clearly suggest this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.170.107 (talkcontribs) 09:29, 28 April 2008

I just added a little clarification to align the explanation to the pseudocode. The 11th plague of Egypt (talk) 21:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


What is the point of the target_attribute. Shouldn't the algorithm just return the most common label of the renaming examples (+/-) ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.2.162.88 (talk) 06:37, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I got the feeling that the algorithm does nothing for comprehension, it start to focus on trivial useless case where no classification is needed. It doesn't spend any time on stop criterion. AsTeRfr (talk) 16:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Formula

[edit]

The formula isn't followed of explanation about its variables... So its useless for non aware reader. Can someone develop this points ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.114.71.176 (talk) 13:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I've fixed this using the Douglas D. Dankel II (University of Florida)'s website, for me the Occam razor's page is not at its place, I don't know if we should remove it or move it.AsTeRfr (talk)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ID3 algorithm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]