Talk:Retinopathy
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Retinopathy.
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Haiphamalicious. Peer reviewers: Ryan1514.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 October 2019 and 23 November 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ALKNOPTR.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
note
[edit]My objectives for this page in the next 4 weeks include: Week 1: Find good secondary sources and texts and lay down basic structure -polish the lead paragraph -lay down foundation structure: introduction, epidemiology, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, treatment, prevention Week 2: Work on intro, epidemiology, and pathogenesis sections Week 3: Work on pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention sections Week 4: Review, polish, look at reviewer's edits and make priority revisions --Haiphamalicious (talk) 20:06, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Peer Feedback by Ryan1514
[edit]Week 1: Find good secondary sources and texts and lay down basic structure -polish the lead paragraph -lay down foundation structure: introduction, epidemiology, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, treatment, prevention
-->Lead section is a great summary that is concise and easy to follow.
Week 2: Work on intro, epidemiology, and pathogenesis sections –Epidemiology section gives relevant information.
-->Consider putting in a sentence about the cost effect of retinopathy, specifically diabetic retinopathy in the US. Great job combinging the phogenesis and pathophysiology. The [2] book source does not lead to the particular information that it is citing. I don’t know if that is a problem or not? Is this the same source that provides info about sickle cell/hyperviscosity/central artery thrombosis related diseases? Great “proliferative” and “other causes” sections.
Thank you for the feedback, the source 2 links to an ISBN since it is a physical book and not an e-text. Haiphamalicious (talk) 17:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Week 3: Work on pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention sections—
-->Treatment section has a sentence starting with “evidence show”. The screening and prevention section may benefit from showing other ways to screen and prevent this disease besides telemedicine.
Week 4: Review, polish, look at reviewer's edits and make priority revisions –
-->Overall a concise page that gives all relevant information for the reader. Great Job!