Talk:AEC Swift

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removal of deletion template

I am about to remove the deletion template from this article as I disagree with the reason given of "Fails notability". I know from past reading that this model of bus (like most London buses) has been extensively written about in books and magazines, its shortcomings being debated at some length. I just don't happen to currently have access to any of those publications in order to use them for improving the article. I am however convinced that an encyclopedic article can and should be written.

The Swift at one time made up about a quarter of the fleet of Britain's largest bus operator (London Transport) so I would consider it at least as notable as most other bus models. Automotive models are routinely considered notable, and I don't think this is a particular exception. Quackdave (talk) 19:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]