This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 08:35, 8 February 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WP Philosophy}}, {{WikiProject Cities}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 08:35, 8 February 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WP Philosophy}}, {{WikiProject Cities}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
If anyone was wondering, as I was, whether anti-urbanism is an exact translation of "antiurbain", it turns out that antiurbain is an Anglicism derived from "anti-urbanism" — apparently a more flexible term than "anti-ville" [1]. Not included in this translation is the section "Conséquences sur le plan de l'aménagement du territoire" (consequences for spatial planning, I guess) as well as two short sections on international relations and cinema. The whole thing needs editing for style which I can probably do myself soon, not that I would mind if someone else wanted to. groupuscule (talk) 04:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I did some digging on French Wikipedia (using Google Translate, since I barely speak any French) and it appears that the French article was part of a university assignment - therefore it's unsurprising that this article seems to be filled with POV, OR, and SYNTH. At the same time, once you cut through it there's a fair bit of good material to work with. The article probably needs a complete rewrite but there is definitely some material that should be preserved. CJK09 (talk) 02:15, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
