Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Cities page.
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19|
|This page is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot II. Threads with no replies in 90 days may be automatically moved.|
Briarcliff Manor, New York has been nominated for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:49, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Popular pages report
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Cities.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
- The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
- The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
- The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We're grateful to m:User talk:Community Tech bot.for his original , and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Cities, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
RfC: Population Density
|Option 1||Option 2|
Used by older article bots and Settlement Infobox. Common on many articles.
Supported by some sources, and used by Featured Articles.
- Neither We shouldn't be making the calculation. That would be WP:Original Research. Rather we should choose a single credible WP:Third-party source for all cities or for each country if there is not single source for the entire world. If no source for the statistic, then we should not enter a statistic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iloilo Wanderer (talk • contribs) 23:00 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Iloilo Wanderer: Population density calculations don't count as original research. — JJBers 16:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- The calculation itself doesn't count as OR, but the decision as to what formula to use does. TimothyJosephWood 18:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Neither, as per Iloilo Wanderer's remarks. All data are covered by WP:NOR. Borsoka (talk) 03:28, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- Get it from a source if you can North8000 (talk) 17:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not 100% familiar with this topic, saw this was an RFC and decided to comment. Is there a difference between total area and total land area? Is total area including all of the non-habitual places, such as waters, high mountains, etc? Is land area only including the land? If that is correct, then I would support the total land area / population = population density. Tutelary (talk) 15:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- I believe that total land area includes high mountains, but not water. — JJBers 15:49, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- I support using the land area to determine population density. Any places that do have housing over water likely won't have anything close to a number of such housing to affect the total density. --JonRidinger (talk) 18:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- It's not area/population, but population/area which gives population density on a given area (settlement).--Vin09 (talk) 13:24, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Statistics are very tricky, even seemingly simple statistics like this, as this RFC proves. What is included in "area" (mountains, water, marshland)? What is included in "population" (illegal immigrants, students, military, temporary residents, missionaries away)? "There are three types of lies in the world: lies, damned lies and statistics" (supposedly Disraeli, but look up the quote for its questionable history). That is why we use third-party sources. Let statisticians and statistical agencies answer these questions. They have been debating them much longer than any of us. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 02:59, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Be sure to check out the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline#Adding dual-maps displaying both the Contiguous United States and the city's State. I know the issue was discussed here two years ago, so I'm guessing it will get a similar response, but it's nonetheless being discussed again. At issue is the inclusion of state and national level maps in the infobox, especially now that the display parameter can show multiple pushpin maps in the same spot. --JonRidinger (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Template for city wikicode split
Is there any template out there already that will take a input such as "Paris, France", and subst it out for "Paris, France", couldn't find on my own, thanks if anyone knows. WikiVirusC(talk) 01:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
On whether the Newtown, Connecticut template should be mentioned in the Sandy Hook shooting article
Please see: Talk:Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting#Newtown, Connecticut template WhisperToMe (talk) 13:18, 7 August 2017 (UTC)