Jump to content

Talk:Symbolic ethnicity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 22:08, 9 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Ethnic groups}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Confusion/Synthesis?

[edit]

In the first fly-by in preparing to review article for the DYK cited above, some questions arose:

  • Is the phenomenon restricted to the North America? While the article as now written presents the term only in that context, am curious as whether it is or might be applied elsewhere, and if so how title might be considered in a WP:Worldwide view? Should the title reflect this with the addtion of "in North America?" Would be good to avoid a future tagging:
  • The term White Anglo Saxon Protestant is used in the introduction, while the term European American is used in the Overview section. They are different and in contradiction to each other as presented.
  • A claim is made with regard to language preceding the list of self-identified ethic groups in the USA. Can there be a an in-line citation added?

Think it's a very interesting topic and article is generally well structured/ref'd, etc, and would like to see it go somewhere. Djflem (talk) 13:57, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The term was introduced for the social phenomenon in the US, so yeah, it applies to the US only. Some people might use it for Canada, Europe, etc., but the term by Gans is for the US.
The term White Anglo Saxon Protestant is used in the introduction, while the term European American is used in the Overview section. They are different and in contradiction to each other as presented. What you mean?
A claim is made with regard to language preceding the list of self-identified ethic groups in the USA. Can there be a an in-line citation added? An inline citation for what? --Երևանցի talk 19:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The claim that: Although language isn't the only factor determining one's ethnicity, it is a major factor. In which citied is that claim madd? Needs a inline citation.Djflem (talk) 21:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Two refs added. --Երևանցի talk 23:11, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I flagged it with a globalize because although the term may have developed in America, it is clearly a more widespread phenomenon and examples can be found over the world although not necessarily referred to with the same name in the literature. Catrìona (talk) 18:24, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible resources

[edit]
  • Strauss, Anselm L. (1997 (originally published Free Press, 1959)), Mirrors and Masks (6th ed.), Transaction Books Rutgers University, ISBN 978-1-56000-935-1 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)

Merge proposal

[edit]

Just came across the undiscussed merge proposal. I would vote against merging, since these are not the same concepts. Yuchitown (talk) 19:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]