Jump to content

Talk:Type signature

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 12:39, 10 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Merge proposal

[edit]

I support merging Method signature into this page (proposed in November 2008) because a method signature is a category of type signature and is not important enough to warrant its own page. If no one objects, I will merge them.  dmyersturnbull  talk 02:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And what about Signature (computer science)? Alksentrs (talk) 18:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support merging Signature (computer science) into this page. Mainly because it is a terrible article. --Specrat (talk) 02:31, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please, merge all. They seem to refer to the same topic. --Pnm (talk) 02:50, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would be happy to see someone merge these articles and remove the hand-holding advice oriented towards computer science undergraduates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.100.119 (talk) 23:18, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please merge all. Sae1962 (talk) 14:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Function type?

[edit]

Function type redirects to this article. What is function type? --Abdull (talk) 19:20, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citation work is needed

[edit]

The citations included each only cover a specific language, yet we somehow have 8 languages covered in this article. I believe we need a citation per language or a citation that covers multiple languages. Additionally, the source for C#, based on my reading, does not seem to support the article. The Java source is from Dotdash, and I know there are better sources for the Java language than that. I am planning on working on the sources at a later date. Gsquaredxc (talk) 15:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]