Talk:CEPOS

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Libertarianism

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

Repeated political vandalism

This page has been under repeated political vandalism. Among other things, the description of CEPOS has been changed to a degree that indicates blatant political POV, incorrect things have been asserted about CEPOS, and CEPOS has been accused of Pseudo science without sufficient reference. These attacks have been carried out by ThomasNielsen42, whom I have given a first warning. I am placing this page on my watchlist.

Pontoppidan (talk) 01:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is about a content dispute, not vandalism. Also Pontoppidan's editing (under various IPs) is not clearly neutral. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

International Property Rights Index

Does anyone have some information on this source. I wanted to confirm it but, when I went to the site, it was just a general thing and I didn't see CEPOS (although it's possible I didn't look enough into it). Leefkrust22 (talk) 01:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The same question applies to the award section as well. Leefkrust22 (talk) 01:18, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]