Talk:Combat box
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Combat box article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Diagrams
[edit]If anyone has access to pictures of planes in formations or diagrams of them, please feel free to add to this article. I haven't yet found any public domain diagrams.--Buckboard 14:36, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- I've just added a reference to the 398th Bomb Group Combat Formations - if I can get to it I'll make new illustrations for this article based on this info brain 14:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- In the Top View of the Formation Diagram in the upper right hand corner there appears to be an error with the labeling of the High and Low Groups. Vertically the groups ascend in height to the right. Thus Low is on the Left, Lead is higher, and High to the Right is higher. See 398th Bomb Group Combat Formations. I hesitate to make changes to this complex diagram. If you would like to discuss, please contact the webmaster at 398th Bomb Group via the address link in lower left hand corner. DaveJ08 (talk) 23:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles