Talk:Computer (magazine)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Computer (magazine) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer (magazine)'s external link to DBLP[edit]

The external link to DBLP says "partial from 1975 volume 8, complete from 1981 volume 14". I suggest changing it to "partial from 1975 volume 8, complete from 1988 volume 21)." The reason for this suggested change is that some pre-1988 years (e.g., 1985) are missing some issues in DBLP. 70.19.200.150 20:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IEEE07's additions[edit]

I have removed and refactored IEEE07 (talk · contribs)'s contributions to this article. The text sounded as if it was listed verbatim from copyrighted material, and even if it wasn't it was full of weasel words. I've also removed the general comments made about the IEEE, since that information belongs in the IEEE article which is linked to from this article. BigNate37_(T) 18:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]