Talk:Utah State Route 96

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations	Utah
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

United States: Utah Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Mid-importance).

Assessment

Article now has at least a start on all of the following, lead-in, route description, history, intersection list, infobox. I think this merits Start-class. Go ahead and revert if you disagree. DeFaultRyan (talk) 21:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely at start; some would say it's up at C-class (too bad UDOT doesn't have a history PDF on this route). I'll be expanding the RD when I get a faster internet connection so it's up to C. C L — 21:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm going to promote this to C, I'm guessing no one will challenge this (I hope at least). Cheers - C L — 05:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully the history could get a little bit more at some point, but yeah, this merits a C in my book. -- Kéiryn (talk) 07:45, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]