Jump to content

User talk:2A01:36D:1200:28EE:D087:640E:62F4:7773

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2a01:36d:1200:28ee:d087:640e:62f4:7773 (talk) at 17:54, 18 March 2024 (Created page with '{{Unblock request|reason=I was blocked for a week for "disruptive edits", which seems to be a mistake, as I don't know how attempting to start an AFD (for Wrightspeed X1) as an anonymous user counts as disruptive. Equally as confusing is Nutsa Buzaladze, where I changed the expat category to an immigrant category, which is more accurate as the subject took up permanent residence in the US (she has since moved to Dubai.) She is even in California's Wikip...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

2A01:36D:1200:28EE:D087:640E:62F4:7773 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked for a week for "disruptive edits", which seems to be a mistake, as I don't know how attempting to start an AFD (for Wrightspeed X1) as an anonymous user counts as disruptive. Equally as confusing is Nutsa Buzaladze, where I changed the expat category to an immigrant category, which is more accurate as the subject took up permanent residence in the US (she has since moved to Dubai.) She is even in California's Wikiproject, so I don't see why we shouldn't change the expat category to immigrant category. Now the block has been extended to three months. I don't see why my old vandal edits should be added into the equation. I seem to have been blocked again because of this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1196506204. I have no idea why it was removed, as I wasn't being outright anti-Semitic, I was just asking if it would seem anti-Semitic if I did something. So I would like to appeal the block. Appealing again because of the extremely inappropriate and downright aggressive decline I got, which I've reported to ArbCom. I'm here because UTRS told me to come to my user page. If this is rejected again for being a range block, may I direct you to this quote from the block message: "Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block."

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was blocked for a week for "disruptive edits", which seems to be a mistake, as I don't know how attempting to start an AFD (for [[Wrightspeed X1]]) as an anonymous user counts as disruptive. Equally as confusing is Nutsa Buzaladze, where I changed the expat category to an immigrant category, which is more accurate as the subject took up permanent residence in the US (she has since moved to Dubai.) She is even in California's Wikiproject, so I don't see why we shouldn't change the expat category to immigrant category. Now the block has been extended to three months. I don't see why my old vandal edits should be added into the equation. I seem to have been blocked again because of this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1196506204. I have no idea why it was removed, as I wasn't being outright anti-Semitic, I was just asking if it would seem anti-Semitic if I did something. So I would like to appeal the block. Appealing again because of the extremely inappropriate and downright aggressive decline I got, which I've reported to ArbCom. I'm here because UTRS told me to come to my user page. If this is rejected again for being a range block, may I direct you to this quote from the block message: "Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block." |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked for a week for "disruptive edits", which seems to be a mistake, as I don't know how attempting to start an AFD (for [[Wrightspeed X1]]) as an anonymous user counts as disruptive. Equally as confusing is Nutsa Buzaladze, where I changed the expat category to an immigrant category, which is more accurate as the subject took up permanent residence in the US (she has since moved to Dubai.) She is even in California's Wikiproject, so I don't see why we shouldn't change the expat category to immigrant category. Now the block has been extended to three months. I don't see why my old vandal edits should be added into the equation. I seem to have been blocked again because of this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1196506204. I have no idea why it was removed, as I wasn't being outright anti-Semitic, I was just asking if it would seem anti-Semitic if I did something. So I would like to appeal the block. Appealing again because of the extremely inappropriate and downright aggressive decline I got, which I've reported to ArbCom. I'm here because UTRS told me to come to my user page. If this is rejected again for being a range block, may I direct you to this quote from the block message: "Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block." |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked for a week for "disruptive edits", which seems to be a mistake, as I don't know how attempting to start an AFD (for [[Wrightspeed X1]]) as an anonymous user counts as disruptive. Equally as confusing is Nutsa Buzaladze, where I changed the expat category to an immigrant category, which is more accurate as the subject took up permanent residence in the US (she has since moved to Dubai.) She is even in California's Wikiproject, so I don't see why we shouldn't change the expat category to immigrant category. Now the block has been extended to three months. I don't see why my old vandal edits should be added into the equation. I seem to have been blocked again because of this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1196506204. I have no idea why it was removed, as I wasn't being outright anti-Semitic, I was just asking if it would seem anti-Semitic if I did something. So I would like to appeal the block. Appealing again because of the extremely inappropriate and downright aggressive decline I got, which I've reported to ArbCom. I'm here because UTRS told me to come to my user page. If this is rejected again for being a range block, may I direct you to this quote from the block message: "Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block." |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

2A01:36D:1200:28EE:D087:640E:62F4:7773 (talk) 17:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]