User talk:Zeblade12

March 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Tiznit, you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 01:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Skitash, sock of whom? Drmies (talk) 01:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@H0x7c00. Skitash (talk) 01:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Im not the user you mentioned, i'm a new member and i came here after I saw that the berber names of those cities were erased. Zeblade12 (talk) 01:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies This account was created as soon as I reverted H0x7c00's edits. The two are making identical edits and this particular user is currently engaging in an edit war on my own talk page. Skitash (talk) 02:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Skitash Again, i am not the user that you mentioned. I would also like to add that you keep on deleting my messages even when i just want to talk. How am i supposed to communicate with you if you just delete everyone of my messages ? Zeblade12 (talk) 02:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason other user has joined and is also trying to to undo the damage you have caused with zero reasoning except for the possible attempt to erase anything related to the Amazigh language is that we all possibly came from the same post on social media where we saw screenshots of what you have done for the city of Agadir, Tiznit and Tarouadant and are pissed about it. You have zero right or reasoning behind removing the Tifinagh naming of the cities. All those cities are Amazigh in content and meaning. Only person abusing his "power" here is you. If you keep abusing it, expect more people to fight against your blatant vandalism. Wikipedia is not meant for biased people with certain ideologies which promote the erasure of other cultures, especially those which have already suffered enough thanks to the Arabization Movements of NA. H0x7c00 (talk) 10:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zeblade12, if they don't want you on their talk page, you have to respect that. It works both ways of course: you can tell them the same thing. User:Skitash, there is no technical evidence of any socking.

Let me suggest that you (two, three) hash this out on the talk page, but let me add that FORLANG is about the title, not about what's in the lead--and Arabic is as native or foreign as Tifinagh in that part of the world. Again, though, this should be discussed on the talk page, or maybe at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Morocco. Good luck to all of you, Drmies (talk) 02:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem with that, I simply didn't know where to ask,on their page or on mine. I deleted my post on their page.

Zeblade12 (talk) 03:16, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it seems that this account had been created with a single purpose; to disruptively inject original research into every Morocco-related article as possible. This edit just suggests that the user did not bother reading any of my edit summaries but continued to make their own edits with nonsensical edit summaries. Skitash (talk) 10:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies Hello again and sorry to bother you but I have added back the Tifinagh names on many pages of Moroccan cities and @Skitash keeps on deleting them telling that there is "no original research". This is vandalism. Amazigh written in Tifinagh letters is a native langage of Morocco and deserves to be shown just as much as Arabic. Also, @Skitash still does not want to talk about why they want so much to erase Tifinagh script. You said that FORLANG was just about the title yet @Skitash keep inventing excuses just to pursue what I see is an agenda. Zeblade12 (talk) 10:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]