User talk:LeoFrank
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
AI and AIX fleet page
Hi. It's a good thing you've removed 737max orders from Air India fleet page. It's abundantly clear that they'll all go for AIX, yet some people are changing it again and again. May I also request you to update the same on the AIX Wikipedia page as well? P.s. I tried to change it some time back, but like I said, someone keeps changing it again and again 59.88.131.183 (talk) 03:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Copy paste of content
Hello LeoFrank, I need your help in reviewing the recent additions by PotatoCyborg in Christ University, which seems unnecessary as the person has basically copy pasted the entire articles, rather than summarising in few lines. Tobinkoshy (talk) 16:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hey Tobinkoshy. If you have actually read the wiki contents and the citations it would be obvious that its summarized. It just looks huge because the University has lots of controversies. Please show me at-least one instance of direct copy paste evidence.
- And hello LeoFrank. You can't just edit out all the controversies by doing a huge (−12,456) revert back to a version over a month old. If you have any issues with formatting or citations let me know. PotatoCyborg (talk) 15:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- PotatoCyborg Oh really? Ever heard of WP:BRD? And do you WP:OWN the page that I have to consult you to remove problematic content? — LeoFrank Talk 15:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- LeoFrank, I urge you to consider the principles of Wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy. The extensive reverts seem to diminish the comprehensive nature of the article, potentially skewing the portrayal of Christ University. While I acknowledge the importance of brevity, the deletion of well-sourced and significant information appears as an attempt to obscure the full spectrum of the university's history, including its controversies. We should aim for a balanced representation, allowing readers to access a complete historical record. Rather than large-scale deletions, we should work collaboratively to refine and improve the content, ensuring it meets Wikipedia's standards for accuracy, neutrality, and verifiability. Let's focus on editing and refining the content rather than erasing substantial parts of it, which might inadvertently lead to an information bias. PotatoCyborg (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please publish all what you are putting up in your news article if you are a journalist. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a collection of news and responses from accused! I suggest you to read WP:NOT which you seem totally unaware of before you just blindly revert to justify your point-of-view — LeoFrank Talk 14:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- LeoFrank, my intention is not to transform Wikipedia into a news outlet but to ensure that the encyclopedic content reflects a comprehensive and balanced view of Christ University's history, including its controversies, as per Wikipedia's guidelines. The WP:NOT policy you referenced indeed stipulates that Wikipedia is not a newspaper, but it also emphasizes the importance of including significant information relevant to the subject's notability, which these controversies undeniably are. My edits are driven by the desire to maintain a neutral point of view and to document significant events in the university's history, backed by reliable sources. I advocate for a discussion on the content's relevance and representation, not its complete omission, to preserve the integrity and neutrality of the article. Let's collaborate to ensure the content is concise, factual, and adheres to Wikipedia's standards, rather than dismissing substantial, verified information. PotatoCyborg (talk) 15:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- The content you added has nothing to do with WP:NOV. Each and every controversy is also not necessary and notable either. Also, who writes reactions of students, accused in an encyclopedia? This is purely blog-like/news-like material. You are clearly here for a single purpose— LeoFrank Talk 15:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- LeoFrank, my intention is not to transform Wikipedia into a news outlet but to ensure that the encyclopedic content reflects a comprehensive and balanced view of Christ University's history, including its controversies, as per Wikipedia's guidelines. The WP:NOT policy you referenced indeed stipulates that Wikipedia is not a newspaper, but it also emphasizes the importance of including significant information relevant to the subject's notability, which these controversies undeniably are. My edits are driven by the desire to maintain a neutral point of view and to document significant events in the university's history, backed by reliable sources. I advocate for a discussion on the content's relevance and representation, not its complete omission, to preserve the integrity and neutrality of the article. Let's collaborate to ensure the content is concise, factual, and adheres to Wikipedia's standards, rather than dismissing substantial, verified information. PotatoCyborg (talk) 15:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please publish all what you are putting up in your news article if you are a journalist. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a collection of news and responses from accused! I suggest you to read WP:NOT which you seem totally unaware of before you just blindly revert to justify your point-of-view — LeoFrank Talk 14:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- LeoFrank, I urge you to consider the principles of Wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy. The extensive reverts seem to diminish the comprehensive nature of the article, potentially skewing the portrayal of Christ University. While I acknowledge the importance of brevity, the deletion of well-sourced and significant information appears as an attempt to obscure the full spectrum of the university's history, including its controversies. We should aim for a balanced representation, allowing readers to access a complete historical record. Rather than large-scale deletions, we should work collaboratively to refine and improve the content, ensuring it meets Wikipedia's standards for accuracy, neutrality, and verifiability. Let's focus on editing and refining the content rather than erasing substantial parts of it, which might inadvertently lead to an information bias. PotatoCyborg (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- PotatoCyborg Oh really? Ever heard of WP:BRD? And do you WP:OWN the page that I have to consult you to remove problematic content? — LeoFrank Talk 15:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Common name
Have a look at this change to WP:COMMONNAME. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I restored the WP:COMMONNAME, but didn't remove the other name, which seem to show up in RS. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I somehow feel IATA's code search should be used for naming convention. — LeoFrank Talk 16:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop trying to cover up Controversies of Christ University
Please stop trying to cover up controversies of Christ University. The entire "Controversies" section has been removed with the reasoning of WP:NOTNEWS, which is not applicable in this context. This action appears as an attempt to obscure the historical and ongoing issues within the institution. It is crucial for the sake of transparency and accountability that all significant events, especially those that have impacted the university's reputation and stakeholder trust, are documented comprehensively and impartially. Therefore, I urge reconsideration of the removal and advocate for a balanced and well-cited section that accurately reflects the university's history, including its controversies. PotatoCyborg (talk) 14:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Since you are so interested in including reactions of students, accused and write news-like content, please do so in your own news agency since you don't seem to understand how to write encyclopedic content. — LeoFrank Talk 15:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)