User:Pacamah/sandbox
Kalima v. State of Hawai'i
| Baehr v. Miike | |
|---|---|
 Seal of the Supreme Court of Hawaii | |
| Court | Supreme Court of Hawaii |
| Full case name | Leona Kalima, Diane Boner, Raynette Nalani Ah Chong, Special Administrator of the Estate of Joseph Ching, Deceased, Caroline Bright, Donna Kuehu, and James Akiona, et al., vs. State of Hawai‘i, State of Hawai‘i Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, et al. |
| Decided | February 7, 2024 |
| Court membership | |
| Chief judge | Mark E. Recktenwald |
| Associate judges | Sabrina McKenna, Todd W. Eddins, Lisa M. Ginoza, Vladimir Devens |
| Case opinions | |
| "The spirit of Aloha clashes with a federally-mandated lifestyle that lets citizens walk around with deadly weapons during day-to-day activities" | |
Kalima, et al. v. State, et al., Civil No. 99-4771-12 LWC (First Cir. Haw.) (2023) was a decision of the Supreme Court of Hawaii which held that Native Hawaiians should be awarded damages due to Hawaiian home land.
Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
| Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued January 9, 2023 Decided May 18, 2023 | |
| Full case name | Ohio Adjutant General's Department et al. v. Federal Labor Relations Authority et al. |
| Docket no. | 21-1454 |
| Citations | 598 U.S. __ (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Judgment for defendants, [1] (Washington Supreme Court, Dec. 16, 2021); |
| Holding | |
| The National Labor Relations Act did not preempt Glacier’s state tort claims related to the destruction of company property during a labor dispute where the union failed to take reasonable precautions to avoid foreseeable and imminent danger to the property. Washington Supreme Court reversed and remanded. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Jackson |
| Dissent | Alito, Gorsuch |
Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, No. 21-1454, 598 U.S. ___ (2023) was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which held that , concerning . In an - decision, the Court .
Wilkins v. US
| Bittner v. United States | |
|---|---|
| |
| Argued November 2, 2022 Decided February 28, 2023 | |
| Full case name | Alexandru Bittner v. United States |
| Docket no. | 21-1195 |
| Citations | 598 U.S. __ (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Judgment for defendants, [2] (Washington Supreme Court, Dec. 16, 2021); |
| Holding | |
| The National Labor Relations Act did not preempt Glacier’s state tort claims related to the destruction of company property during a labor dispute where the union failed to take reasonable precautions to avoid foreseeable and imminent danger to the property. Washington Supreme Court reversed and remanded. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Barrett, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh |
| Concurrence | Thomas (in judgment), joined by Gorsuch |
| Concurrence | Alito (in judgment), joined by Thomas, Gorsuch |
| Dissent | Jackson |
| Laws applied | |
| National Labor Relations Act | |