Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda Morman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ as no one is arguing for retention or otherwise participating Star Mississippi 22:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rhonda Morman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. One source is a resume, another is a PR puff piece (the source is "BNM Publicity Group & Management"), and the third (the only WP:RS) mentions Morman in passing in one sentence. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is about all I find, and I'm not sure how RS it is [1]. I don't see enough sourcing for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 22:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:22, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Staff writer piece [2], seemingly promotional. I don't see anything else we can use. Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 00:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

already voted. so stricken. Oaktree b (talk) 00:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.