Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashok Chauhan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ashok Chauhan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable per WP:ANYBIO WP:NBASIC, references are obscure running mentions or even unrelated. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 10:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Businesspeople, India, and Delhi. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 10:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pretty much all of the links in the article seem to either be broken, make no reference to the subject, or make very brief, passing mentions of the subject which is not in line with WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. The only other source I could find was a PR piece from the subject's university that he presumably founded. Lynch44 (talk) 12:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Sources are mostly broken and others have no mention on the subject. One source with a reference on Award and can not tell if it is about same person. The subject is not significant or made well known notable achievement to have an page on himself. RangersRus (talk) 14:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per the comments above. TheChronikler7 (talk) 10:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination failed to establish notability. HarshalDhotre06 (talk) 13:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- assertion of WP:PROF is only on founding a university that does not have independent notability. No significant coverage for GNG. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 11:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.