User talk:2A01:36D:1200:94F:6C6F:2FE2:1B6:17C8

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

2A01:36D:1200:94F:6C6F:2FE2:1B6:17C8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

If starting an AFD is "disruptive editing", then protesting peacefully is a war crime. Also, I am NOT. BLOCK. EVADING. IP-check the Alpha2008 user to prove my innocence in that. With the editing pattern logic, stores should be allowed to ban customers who show interes in items that other banned custoemrs have showed interest in.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=If starting an AFD is "disruptive editing", then protesting peacefully is a war crime. Also, I am NOT. BLOCK. EVADING. IP-check the Alpha2008 user to prove my innocence in that. With the editing pattern logic, stores should be allowed to ban customers who show interes in items that other banned custoemrs have showed interest in. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=If starting an AFD is "disruptive editing", then protesting peacefully is a war crime. Also, I am NOT. BLOCK. EVADING. IP-check the Alpha2008 user to prove my innocence in that. With the editing pattern logic, stores should be allowed to ban customers who show interes in items that other banned custoemrs have showed interest in. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=If starting an AFD is "disruptive editing", then protesting peacefully is a war crime. Also, I am NOT. BLOCK. EVADING. IP-check the Alpha2008 user to prove my innocence in that. With the editing pattern logic, stores should be allowed to ban customers who show interes in items that other banned custoemrs have showed interest in. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

2A01:36D:1200:94F:6C6F:2FE2:1B6:17C8 (talk) 12:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

---