Submission declined on 13 May 2024 by Theroadislong (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Theroadislong 5 months ago. Last edited by Geoviswakarma 5 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 13 May 2024 by Grabup (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Grabup 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 11 May 2024 by Iwaqarhashmi (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Iwaqarhashmi 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 8 May 2024 by Iwaqarhashmi (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Iwaqarhashmi 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 29 April 2024 by Dan arndt (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Declined by Dan arndt 6 months ago.

Submission declined on 26 April 2024 by Qcne (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Qcne 6 months ago.

Comment: Don't resubmit until you make some edits. Waqar💬 15:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Comment: Fails WP:NLAWYER / WP:NAUTHOR - requires substantial coverage not mentions in passing. Dan arndt (talk) 04:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Karthikeyan M

Karthikeyan is a Lawyer^[1]^[2], Author^[3].^[4], and Educator from India. He is Senior Central Government Panel ^[5]Counsel of the Government of India^[6] in Madras High Court^[7]

Author

Karthikeyan is an author and expert in the field of competitive exams preparation^[8], particularly focusing on Ethics, Governance, and Internal Security.

Books

Governance in India (Basics & Beyond) published by Pearson^[9]
Ethics, Integrity & Aptitude^[10]
Internal Security^[11]
TNPSC Manual^[12]

References

^ "Madras High Court allows residents' associations, public to clean temple premises, preserve heritage". The Hindu. 30 April 2024.
^ "Govt lawyers told to examine temple tank". The New Indian Express. 5 August 2019.
^ "Access to justice: Embracing the challenges with access to Technology in Legal Services". The Jurisprudence. 2 (2): 44.
^ "'பழனி கோயிலில் இந்து அல்லாதவர்கள் நுழைய தடை சுட்டிக்காட்டுவது எதை?'-பிரபல வழக்கறிஞர் கருத்து". Hindustan Times.
^ "சட்டங்கள் அறிவோம் With Lawyer & Mentor Mr M.Karthikeyan | The Book Show ft RJ Ananthi". The Book Show.
^ "கோவில் அறங்காவலர்களின் விபரம் வெளியிட தமிழக அரசுக்கு உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு". Lokal App.
^ "List Existing Panel Counsel Union India". Department of Legal Affairs.
^ "Chennai resident secures top rank in Tamil Nadu in UPSC civil services exam". The Hindu. 23 May 2023.
^ Governance In India: Basics And Beyond. Pearson (published January 1, 2017). 2017. ISBN 9789332588035.
^ Ethics, Integrity and Aptitude. Mc Graw Hill (published January 1, 2017). 2017. ISBN 9789352606238.
^ Internal Security for Civil Services. Pearson (published June 17, 2016). 2016. ISBN 9789332573932.
^ GENERAL STUDIES FOR TNPSC. McGraw Hill Education. March 9, 2016. ISBN 9789385880155.

[1] "Madras High Court allows residents' associations, public to clean temple premises, preserve heritage". The Hindu. 30 April 2024.

[2] "Govt lawyers told to examine temple tank". The New Indian Express. 5 August 2019.

[3] "Access to justice: Embracing the challenges with access to Technology in Legal Services". The Jurisprudence. 2 (2): 44.

[4] "'பழனி கோயிலில் இந்து அல்லாதவர்கள் நுழைய தடை சுட்டிக்காட்டுவது எதை?'-பிரபல வழக்கறிஞர் கருத்து". Hindustan Times.

[5] "சட்டங்கள் அறிவோம் With Lawyer & Mentor Mr M.Karthikeyan | The Book Show ft RJ Ananthi". The Book Show.

[6] "கோவில் அறங்காவலர்களின் விபரம் வெளியிட தமிழக அரசுக்கு உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு". Lokal App.

[7] "List Existing Panel Counsel Union India". Department of Legal Affairs.

[8] "Chennai resident secures top rank in Tamil Nadu in UPSC civil services exam". The Hindu. 23 May 2023.

[9] Governance In India: Basics And Beyond. Pearson (published January 1, 2017). 2017. ISBN 9789332588035.

[10] Ethics, Integrity and Aptitude. Mc Graw Hill (published January 1, 2017). 2017. ISBN 9789352606238.

[11] Internal Security for Civil Services. Pearson (published June 17, 2016). 2016. ISBN 9789332573932.

[12] GENERAL STUDIES FOR TNPSC. McGraw Hill Education. March 9, 2016. ISBN 9789385880155.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]