Jump to content

Quotient type

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Caleb Stanford (talk | contribs) at 19:56, 27 May 2024 (Variations: typo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

In the field of type theory in computer science, a quotient type is a data type which respects a user-defined equality relation. A quotient type defines an equivalence relation on elements of the type - for example, we might say that two values of the type Person are equivalent if they have the same name; formally p1 == p2 if p1.name == p2.name. In type theories which allow quotient types, an additional requirement is made that all operations must respect the equivalence between elements. For example, if f is a function on values of type Person, it must be the case that for two Persons p1 and p2, if p1 == p2 then f(p1) == f(p2).

Quotient types are part of a general class of types known as algebraic data types. In the early 1980s, quotient types were defined and implemented as part of the Nuprl proof assistant, in work led by Robert L. Constable and others.[1][2] Quotient types have been studied in the context of Martin-Löf type theory,[3] dependent type theory,[4] higher-order logic,[5] and homotopy type theory.[6]

Definition

[edit]

To define a quotient type, one typically provides a data type together with an equivalence relation on that type, for example, Person // ==, where == is a user-defined equality relation. The elements of the quotient type are equivalence classes of elements of the original type.[3]

Quotient types can be used to define modular arithmetic. For example, if Integer is a data type of integers, can be defined by saying that if the difference is even. We then form the type of integers modulo 2:[1]

Integer //

The operations on integers, +, - can be proven to be well-defined on the new quotient type.

Variations

[edit]

In type theories that lack quotient types, setoids (sets explicitly equipped with an equivalence relation) are often used instead of quotient types. However, unlike with setoids, many type theories may require a formal proof that any functions defined on quotient types are well-defined.[7]

Properties

[edit]

Quotient types are part of a general class of types known as algebraic data types. Just as product types and sum types are analogous to the cartesian product and disjoint union of abstract algebraic structures, quotient types reflect the concept of set-theoretic quotients, sets whose elements are partitioned into equivalence classes by a given equivalence relation on the set. Algebraic structures whose underlying set is a quotient are also termed quotients. Examples of such quotient structures include quotient sets, groups, rings, categories and, in topology, quotient spaces.[3]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Constable, Robert L. (1986). Implementing Mathematics with the Nuprl Proof Development System. Prentice-Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-451832-9.
  2. ^ Constable, R. L. (1984). "Mathematics as programming". In Clarke, Edmund; Kozen, Dexter (eds.). Logics of Programs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 164. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 116–128. doi:10.1007/3-540-12896-4_359. hdl:1813/6405. ISBN 978-3-540-38775-6.
  3. ^ a b c Li, Nuo (2015-07-15). "Quotient types in type theory". eprints.nottingham.ac.uk. Retrieved 2023-09-13.
  4. ^ Hofmann, Martin (1995). "A simple model for quotient types". Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 902. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 216–234. doi:10.1007/BFb0014055. ISBN 978-3-540-49178-1.
  5. ^ Homeier, Peter V. (2005). "A Design Structure for Higher Order Quotients". In Hurd, Joe; Melham, Tom (eds.). Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 3603. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 130–146. doi:10.1007/11541868_9. ISBN 978-3-540-31820-0.
  6. ^ "The HoTT Book". Homotopy Type Theory. 2013-03-12. Retrieved 2023-09-13.
  7. ^ Hofmann, Martin (1997). "Extensional Constructs in Intensional Type Theory". SpringerLink. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0963-1. ISBN 978-1-4471-1243-3.

See also

[edit]