Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Din Mohammad Jurat
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Din Mohammad Jurat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article subject fails to meet WP:GNG. The only source of which I can find about him on Google was about him being sacked as an advisor. Nothing else more than that. Also the creator of the article seems to be a newbie which I guess hasn't practiced about the wikipedia article wizard before contributing to wikipedia. You can also visit here for further reference. Most of the reference used on this particular article headline are not corresponding to the original source. Maybe he had to fake it to make it look like its an independent reliable source. Gabriel (talk to me ) 18:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Politicians. Gabriel (talk to me ) 18:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per ladmc. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This article clearly meet the Wp:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN.
please have a look at these reliable sources.
Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 21:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- All the link you have provided still doesn't address why he was nominated for an AFD. The only reasonable news was that he was sacked. The rest of the news has nothing to do with him apart from him being sacked. Editors should take note that the article creator was the same person who voted this keep.--Gabriel (talk to me ) 21:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The sources (including the above) only briefly mention him so lack of significant coverage and he barely passes WP:POLITICIAN. The Afgan bios source is better so if there are more like this I might change my mind. The article will need a rewrite though as it is a mess. — Iadmc♫talk 21:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- please have a look at this :https://generalmohammadjurat.blogspot.com/2017/05/1340.html Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 16:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Also this one https://generaljurat.blogspot.com/ Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 16:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- ".blogspot" is not Wiki acceptable sourcing. Non reliable, non-independent. Lekkha Moun (talk) 16:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Also this one https://generaljurat.blogspot.com/ Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 16:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- please have a look at this :https://generalmohammadjurat.blogspot.com/2017/05/1340.html Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 16:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Article is a mess. The tone is very bias. As per WP:POLITICIAN: Subject must have "received significant press coverage". Sourcing seems to only briefly mention him, appears to lack significant coverage. Lekkha Moun (talk) 16:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC)