Jump to content

User talk:Nytix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.46.132.52 (talk) at 23:22, 2 July 2024 (→‎Nomination of New York Show Tickets for deletion: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your edits to Seinfeld

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Nytix! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 16:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. Shadowbot 16:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article New York TV Show Tickets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has substantial NPOV/COI concerns, no real assertion of notability (just a single mention in a newspaper review), no citations, and covers an apparently unremarkable business

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zachlipton (talk) 06:50, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Information icon Hi Nytix! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at New York Show Tickets that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
  • Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 04:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New York Show Tickets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New York Show Tickets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Show Tickets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alansohn (talk) 15:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I always thought that Wikipedia was an encyclopedia, where accurate information (with reliable sources) could live - we posted some very interesting history on where our business came from and how we changed over the many years since inception- who our original customers were and what we did in the early days - but apparently that is now classified as spam? You also locked my account so I cannot make any changes to remove or change anything you don't like. It seems to me that Wikipedia is going through a bit of change for the worse, where the editors have lost sight of what's important. We only posted factual and valuable history on our past history and the various business lines we had over the years - its good history - if Wikipedia does not want to capture that, then who will? This new standard would mean that Wikipedia would have to delete all pages on every company's history, is that the new Wikipedia way? I am very confused, but I am open to hearing what is really happening here. 24.46.132.52 (talk) 23:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]