Wikipedia:Peer review/Dr Disrespect/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
I've listed this article for peer review because, first and foremost, I have been heavily contributing to the article (at first anonymously, as 2601:47:100:ac40:...) and hoping to get it to B-class. I think it is right now, but as @PresN: noted at WT:VG#Dr Disrespect, despite some cleanup and copyediting, which is always helpful
there are "choppy paragraphs, choppy sentences, a flow so close to WP:Proseline that it's almost uncanny, and most of all almost no information about the person that isn't just a list of controversies"
. @Sergecross73: added that they currently have "no interest in writing about these ridiculous, over-the-top gaming personalities. Doubly so with someone with the allegations against him he's got going on at the moment"
. At the article's talk itself, I suggested that there should be a screenshot of a livestream, which was opposed by @Axem Titanium: because both images have Beahm "wearing the same wig and sunglasses he always wears
and "He looks like the same middle-aged white dude in both photos to me. I have a hard time imagining readers not believing that they're the same person"
. There is also a slight contention over a few citations between me and @Rock & roll is not dead:, particularly over Kick (platform).
Thanks, 2601AC47 (talk) 15:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- ...Why was my lack of interest in YouTubers included in the status update of this article...? Sergecross73 msg me 16:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- That was what you pointed out to me. Like I said then, I was hoping that participants of the Wikiproject maybe interested. And despite now almost being nothing to add since the streamer's removal from the YT partner program and almost no word from him, there is still interest in the article's improvement. Also, if you're still wondering about his controversies, no, I've not found a good place for them. 2601AC47 (talk) 16:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)