User talk:Ap201

July 2024

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Kamala Harris for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you post this on my talk page? I have not posted used Talk:Kamala Harris for any discussion at all. The only thing I did there is revert a vandal who removed someone's discussion. I noticed you also vandalized another talk page. Please refrain from vandalism. Ap201 (talk) 00:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ap201 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's difficult to give "good reasons for being unblocked" since no reason was given for being blocked. I noticed someone was abusing wikipedia and treating it like a forum. I also noticed they removed someone's post on the talk page and in their reason, they added their own forum comment. Then it seems like some other account posted on my user page with a false accusation of me discussing something on Talk:Kamala Harris, and removed my polite comment asking the first account to treat an encyclopedia as an encyclopedia. They gave the reason "Editing shows LTA". If my search is correct, that means "Long Term Abuse", which makes me even more confused. Ap201 (talk) 20:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=It's difficult to give "good reasons for being unblocked" since no reason was given for being blocked. I noticed someone was abusing wikipedia and treating it like a forum. I also noticed they removed someone's post on the talk page and in their reason, they added their own forum comment. Then it seems like some other account posted on my user page with a false accusation of me discussing something on Talk:Kamala Harris, and removed my polite comment asking the first account to treat an encyclopedia as an encyclopedia. They gave the reason "Editing shows LTA". If my search is correct, that means "Long Term Abuse", which makes me even more confused. [[User:Ap201|Ap201]] ([[User talk:Ap201#top|talk]]) 20:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=It's difficult to give "good reasons for being unblocked" since no reason was given for being blocked. I noticed someone was abusing wikipedia and treating it like a forum. I also noticed they removed someone's post on the talk page and in their reason, they added their own forum comment. Then it seems like some other account posted on my user page with a false accusation of me discussing something on Talk:Kamala Harris, and removed my polite comment asking the first account to treat an encyclopedia as an encyclopedia. They gave the reason "Editing shows LTA". If my search is correct, that means "Long Term Abuse", which makes me even more confused. [[User:Ap201|Ap201]] ([[User talk:Ap201#top|talk]]) 20:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=It's difficult to give "good reasons for being unblocked" since no reason was given for being blocked. I noticed someone was abusing wikipedia and treating it like a forum. I also noticed they removed someone's post on the talk page and in their reason, they added their own forum comment. Then it seems like some other account posted on my user page with a false accusation of me discussing something on Talk:Kamala Harris, and removed my polite comment asking the first account to treat an encyclopedia as an encyclopedia. They gave the reason "Editing shows LTA". If my search is correct, that means "Long Term Abuse", which makes me even more confused. [[User:Ap201|Ap201]] ([[User talk:Ap201#top|talk]]) 20:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}