User talk:Hogd2007

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! IPSOS (talk) 03:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to this edit summary: this was clearly not an act of vandalism, but rather a content dispute over cited information. Since it is cited, it should stay in unless convincing arguments are made for its removal. Calling somone a vandal when their edit was not vandalism is against WP policy on personal attacks. Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. IPSOS (talk) 03:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's not spam, it's a disambiguation link. They are quite common and have nothing to do with promotion. Removing it suggests that you need to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia a bit more or your editing might be taken as disruptive. IPSOS (talk) 03:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a conflict of interest?

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Inc., you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked indefinitely without further warning.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. GlassFET 17:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signing Comments

Hello. Please remember to always sign your comments using ~~~~. Than you. Yours truly, Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 21:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely for being an obviously abusive sockpuppeteer. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- tariqabjotu 22:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Hogd2007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I am neither a sockpuppeteer, nor am I a sock of anyone else. I merely am a disinterested party who objects to the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Inc. using Wikipedia as a format for advertising. Certain users are editing articles that amounts to nothing less than advertising. This is not only in violation of Wikipedia's rules regarding advertising, but of conflict of interest as well. Any user who objects to their using Wikipedia for advertising purposes, the HOGD, Inc. socks an pupeteer reports to Wikipedia acusing the objective editors themselves of being either socks or sock pupeteers. Please reinstat me immediately and reevaluate what is happenning on the article concerning the article on the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. It should be obvious to any administrator that what is actually happenning here is an attempt by the HOGD, Inc. to use Wikipedia for advertising purposes at the expenst of encyclopedic information.