User talk:Crackedplastic

Your edits to Nissan 300ZX

Cracked what is your deal?! The pictures flat out suck, I am putting better pictures on the page so the page will be better for viewers. There is also a stupid comment that is irrelevant that I removed. I also added a Z31 race picture to compliment the motorsport section. You are prohibiting this page from being better...WTF?

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nissan 300ZX. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thanks. KrakatoaKatie 06:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Shadow1 (talk) 20:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Crackedplastic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My apologies for the edit war. The reason for the reverts was the other user incessantly placed questionable copyright material on the page, including Nissan promotional pics. Other users questioned this, having the images removed (see his User Talk page). Yet the offending user kept uploading the questionable images, despite the User Talk warnings, and even declared himself as the copyright holder, which obviously wasn't true. As such, in the best interests of the community, I kept reverting the 300zx page. However, I have not touched the page since my own warning, above. The other user actually had reverted the page this morning, despite his own edit-war warning (see time stamps). Additionally, I have attempted to resolve this in a mature manner via User talk pages. Again, my apologies for the edit war; I was trying to defend the page against questionable copyrighted material. Thanks.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My apologies for the edit war.  The reason for the reverts was the other user incessantly placed questionable copyright material on the page, including Nissan promotional pics.  Other users questioned this, having the images removed (see his User Talk page).  Yet the offending user kept uploading the questionable images, despite the User Talk warnings, and even declared himself as the copyright holder, which obviously wasn't true.  As such, in the best interests of the community, I kept reverting the 300zx page.  However, I have not touched the page since my own warning, above.  The other user actually had reverted the page this morning, despite his own edit-war warning (see time stamps).  Additionally, I have attempted to resolve this in a mature manner via User talk pages.  Again, my apologies for the edit war; I was trying to defend the page against questionable copyrighted material.  Thanks. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=My apologies for the edit war.  The reason for the reverts was the other user incessantly placed questionable copyright material on the page, including Nissan promotional pics.  Other users questioned this, having the images removed (see his User Talk page).  Yet the offending user kept uploading the questionable images, despite the User Talk warnings, and even declared himself as the copyright holder, which obviously wasn't true.  As such, in the best interests of the community, I kept reverting the 300zx page.  However, I have not touched the page since my own warning, above.  The other user actually had reverted the page this morning, despite his own edit-war warning (see time stamps).  Additionally, I have attempted to resolve this in a mature manner via User talk pages.  Again, my apologies for the edit war; I was trying to defend the page against questionable copyrighted material.  Thanks. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=My apologies for the edit war.  The reason for the reverts was the other user incessantly placed questionable copyright material on the page, including Nissan promotional pics.  Other users questioned this, having the images removed (see his User Talk page).  Yet the offending user kept uploading the questionable images, despite the User Talk warnings, and even declared himself as the copyright holder, which obviously wasn't true.  As such, in the best interests of the community, I kept reverting the 300zx page.  However, I have not touched the page since my own warning, above.  The other user actually had reverted the page this morning, despite his own edit-war warning (see time stamps).  Additionally, I have attempted to resolve this in a mature manner via User talk pages.  Again, my apologies for the edit war; I was trying to defend the page against questionable copyrighted material.  Thanks. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Pardon me for nosing in, but you didn't have to fight them directly. Never fight your enemies directly when you are in a restricted area! There are many other ways to settle disputes, like the Mediation Cabal and asking a third opinion. I'd be happy to settle your dispute for you, if you'd like. - 2-16 17:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]