Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Hills Software

The article doesn't assert it's notability. It's unverifiable and appears that it's purpose is to advertise the company. Witchinghour 03:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Witchinghour 03:22, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 03:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've added some secondary sources, which should go towards notability. While it may be a bit ad-like in places, I don't feel the overall article is an ad. The problems sections can be repaired. CitiCat 05:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Comment: if the article is kept the current minutae listing of every feature should be radically trimmed down, also leaf articles like µ-velOSity should be merged here. The article lacks information about the history. Everyone can look up the current products on their website, the history is what's encyclopedically valuable. Pavel Vozenilek 11:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Inline external links (or put in the EL section) do not reliable sources make. Perhaps if this article were properly referenced and trimmed significantly it would be a keep, but as it stands now it reads like an advertisement. /Blaxthos 16:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
STRONG keep - a deletion spree by a person who does not bother to do a minimal bqackground check. `'юзырь:mikka 19:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - reply to user mikka here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Segger Microcontroller Systems thanks.Witchinghour 19:45, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]