User talk:Digby Tantrum
If you desire a prompt response, I check my email more often than my user pages.
Response
- I was responding to a request from another user in reinstating the "Burn with me" point. I believe as the production staff have said they wanted this as a catchphrase for this episode, a previous use of the phrase within the same series is notable. Wolf of Fenric 18:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- But belief isn't, in itself, grounds for inclusion. I'm afraid that, unless you can produce a source that backs this up as significant (and the Fact File certainly isn't that), it's speculative and therefore original research (although I am open to the possibility that it may prove significant later on; we're just not there yet.)
- I'm not going to waste time reverting it again for the time being. Mainly because I'm sure someone else will. Digby Tantrum 19:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Do you notice that different people keep putting this note in? Seems like many consider it noteworthy. Continuity notes about Francine Jones and the Sinister Woman's conversation keeps going in and out. So does continuity notes about Martha getting the superphone and TARDIS key. In the cases of the latter two; yes, they are covered in the plot summary. But they're continuity noteables, too. The like can be found repeated in the plot and continuity sections of episodes regularily, as people who are keeping up on continuity then don't have to comb the plots to find out which episode Martha got the TARDIS key, and which one Francine's mother spoke to the Sinister Woman about Mr. Saxton. -- AvatarMN 23:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 22 | 28 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 23 | 4 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 24 | 11 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
About OG
I actually do think it's a reliable source - except for user-created content (forums, reviews). Will (talk) 18:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- I know, I checked. Just saying that the OG new section is quite reliable. Will (talk) 18:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Three-parters
Does the "To Be Continued" count? Will (talk) 19:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
==Fan-cr*p==
Hi, I’ve made a proposal here, about fan-cr*p on Doctor Who articles in the wake of a broadcast. Any opinions?--Rambutan (talk) 16:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
your edits to Doctor Who
Hi - a quick look (and it is *quick* so I could be wrong) at your edits to Doctor Who seem to suggest that you have broken 3RR. I'm not going to do anything about it but edit wars are never the way forward. --Fredrick day 22:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- So as you can't argue your point you are now going to try and discredit me? How text book. Pure coincidence, I am posting from a network Movellon 22:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[1] That's happened a few times today!--Rambutan (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Sigh
Maybe...Stupid 24 hour periods. john k 15:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)