Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renee LaRue
Appearance
No arguments found within the article for notability per WP:PORNBIO Tabercil 03:20, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 03:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- DELETE. Fails to establish notability. Besides, if I haven't seen her yet, she's not major or even significantly minor. Qworty 03:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sure that was intended as a joke, but I have to ask: So whether or not you personally know something is the arbiter of whether it's real or notable? Morgan Wick 03:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Depends on his area of expertise, if he's, say, a major porn film producer. :) =Axlq 03:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, notice that the WP:IDONTKNOWIT argument followed the word "besides," thus implying it was not the reasoning behind his !vote, which would appear to be "Fails to establish notability." Someguy1221 05:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Depends on his area of expertise, if he's, say, a major porn film producer. :) =Axlq 03:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sure that was intended as a joke, but I have to ask: So whether or not you personally know something is the arbiter of whether it's real or notable? Morgan Wick 03:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. =Axlq 03:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Bart133 (t) (c) 04:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Oysterguitarist 05:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. *drew 09:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)