Jump to content

User talk:JRSP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SuperFlanker (talk | contribs) at 12:43, 13 August 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



2002 Coup

I have read the Union Radio link you provided as a reference to the claims made in the 2002 Venezuelan coup d'état attempt article, but I must say I couldn't find any mention to the need the opposition manifestants might have had to obtain police permission to head for Miraflores. This doesn't mean I am dening that might have been the case. I just happen to think more solid references, perferably written outside Venezuela or Latin America, would benefit this article, which several users on its talk page have characterized as being inherently biased in favour of President Chávez. -- Ishikawa Minoru 01:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, Union Radio ( the reference I provided ) has an anti-Chavez editorial line. There are several references that will support that the march changed its original route (the Union Radio is one of them). In fact, it was not the police but the Libertador Municipality mayor who had to be informed (the original route was in the Chacao Municipality). I don't know of anywhere in the world where you can make a large demonstration without notifying proper authorities with some anticipation. JRSP 02:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you're trying to say and I agree with it. The problem is we must address the matter with absolute objectivity and try not to assume things other people might not be familiar with. "The march was re-routed without consultation with the Police, who legally had to approve the changed route" - that's the sentence you provided a reference for. According to your previous post, it appears this information is not correct, namely that it was the Libertator Municipality Mayor who needed to be informed. We therefore need some report stating so and furthermore, one stating the opposition forces didn't do so. -- Ishikawa Minoru 14:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halvorssen

I'm going to hold off for a bit on continuing my edits; it's really frustrating to try to work on the article and bring a new editor up to speed on Wiki policies at the same time, and I'm still not sure if she's reading the talk page and understanding policies. Have to watch out for WP:BITE, so best to take it slow. I have so much to add still ... SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Take it easy, no need to rush the article, there is no time limit. JRSP 21:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yikes. Maybe you can find something online about embajador so we can be done with that; this is going to be interesting. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry I am such a bother to you both. I am starting to get the hang of having to read both your talk pages, my talk page, the article on halvorssen's talk page, and all of the many rules. there are so many rules. how do i keep them straight? so many terms... UTCNPOVWBWIKITALKBITE it is like learning a new language. i speak decent spanish and spent a semester in Spain so I can try to learn this new language too!

And JSRP, thanks for letting me know how to get a new password. I also started to change my preferences and I changed the "skin" I recommend you don't do that. it was awful.AS 01:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

also, what do I need to do to get a gold star like the ones sandy has. she has so many stars. why don't you have stars?AS 01:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHy is it signing my initials instead of my username? arrgghh!!!AS 01:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, if you want to discuss about the Thor Halvorssen Hellum article you go to the article's talk page where all editors interested in the article are watching. User talk pages are more suited for user to user communication. It takes some time to learn all the rules, but you will like WP:BITE :-) For the barnstars you have to work hard! If you can make the Thor Halvorssen article a featured article I will give you one. The initials in you signature is because of your user preferences. Go to "my preferences" "user profile" "signature" and delete the "AS" in the box, leave it empty for now. JRSP 01:52, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel attacks

I havn't made any personnel attacks. Carlitos 13:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See User:The 13th 4postle#Supspected Chavistas. You say you suspect I am "paid to edit wikipedia articles" JRSP 13:30, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I honestly think you may be a sock puppet and I have requested your IP to be checked. If you truly are who you say you are then you have nothing to be afraid of and I will take back the "personnel attack." http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_CheckUser_information Carlitos 14:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean you think me and Flanker are the same person? In that case you should go to Requests for Checkuser, here in en-wiki not in meta. I hope you will also take back the attack on Flanker after the investigation. JRSP 17:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never make statements about Gustavo Cisneros

you need to reference your remark to me. i undo verification elimination by peter wheeler. Cinseros article has no reference. It need reference. OK? So eliminate ALL of it or reference everything. OK?Copeyanofull 02:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mire Aqui Tarifado que dos puede jugar este juegito

Thank you SO much for good advice on how to edit. If only you live by same advice. i am not surprised that you, a chavista who never makes any protection of anyone not in line with Chavez in some way, would now take the honorary "be careful" approach in this situation. You contribute everything negative or to protect your "maximo lider mesmo" Hugo Rafael. You POV violation is clear again and again. When you look source you only look for lines bad. You never include anything good about anyone you want to attack. I have reading you contributions. Is only a matter of time before everyone know. Chavez is anti-semitic according to many many many secondary valid sources--including himself. We will not allow our community to make look here like we like Chavez because is not true. At beginning yes, we try to live with Chavez but now he declare war on everyone Israeli or everyone Jewish. And Venevision too also anti-semitic again and again. OK? Asi que deja el chanchuyo y declarate por lo que eres. Lo que tu eres rima con Rana Nuevo.Copeyanofull 02:30, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Rodríguez Rodríguez

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Jorge Rodríguez Rodríguez, which you proposed for deletion, because the page you proposed for deletion was not an article, user page, or user talk page. If you still think the page should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to it, as proposed deletion is only for articles, user pages, and user talk pages. Instead, consider using Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion for this page. In some cases, a speedy deletion criterion may apply. Thanks! Tikiwont 09:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

Thank you for the welcome, I contribute mainly in the Wikipedia in Spanish, but I hope to familiarize myself with this Wikipedia, and then i will start to contribute in all the articles related with our country, regards --Gmarval 18:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks it has been a while without major effort or input

Wikipedia does generate a bit of fatigue, so I did take a break for more opinionated and less rigorous settings, but I see things are pretty much how I left it. The only thing that surprises me about checkuser is that it took so long for someone to accuse me of such a thing. Flanker 12:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JRSP&oldid=150947245"