Talk:Mac OS X Public Beta

Merge with Mac OS X v10.0?

Merge Does this really need it's own page? If we merge it with Mac OS X v10.0, half the article would fit neatly into a "Development" section, and the other half is duplicated in that page already. -- Simxp

Agree I think it should go into Mac OS X 10.0 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.153.67.248 (talk • contribs) 10:48, 28 May 2007.
Agree I think it makes sense to merge this with the Mac OS X page—I went to that page looking for info on the beta and was surprised when I had to seek a different page. After all, the beta was the earliest release of OS X.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.202.135.91 (talk • contribs) 02:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Anonymous people are free to discuss changes, but don't count for votes, if that is what this is. Althepal 01:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree Its a different release and OS as far I'm concerned. Keep this page DanB91 20:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree It's very different, I agree with DanB91, it's almost like calling Windows 95 'Cairo' :) Miguelandres 04:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree There is no separate article for Windows Vista Beta (Longhorn) and regular Windows Vista. This is not a separate OS, just a pre-release, and doesn't need a whole article. Althepal 01:33, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree the Public Beta is different from the typical software beta release because of its cost of entry. also, being substantially different from the 10.0 release and all of the subsequent OS X releases warrants its own article. Ehren 23:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree The beta was a different release and marked the first change to OS X. This deserves its own article. --68.0.125.230 02:30, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]