Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mortal Instruments Trilogy
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Coredesat (talk | contribs) at 05:27, 31 August 2007 (→[[The Mortal Instruments Trilogy]]: rm disruptive duplicate argument). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus despite double keep argument. Merging can be discussed on the article's talk page. --Coredesat 05:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The Mortal Instruments Trilogy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I do not believe this series yet meets the thresholds for notability of books. This article also lacks sources independent of the author's websites. Nancy Vandal 13:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable, not well sourced, a fandom puff - Ringbark 09:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason:
- City_of_Bones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Nancy Vandal 13:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable, not well sourced, a fandom puff - Ringbark 09:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hard to see a stronger case for keep, since the book has been on the appropriate New York Times best seller list [1]. Ban Nancy Vandal for vandalism, he's a member of the FandomWank community, check out his posting history, here and there, who gets his rocks off cyberbeating up on less attractive adolescent girls, like Cassandra Clare. Also check for sockpuppets, so many anon vandal-like posts to the articles. Warn Ringbark that if he comes from FandomWank or its livejournal buddies, as looks like the case, that he's committed bannable behavior. VivianDarkbloom 19:40, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep City of Bones, Delete The Mortal Instruments Trilogy. The novel itself appears to have been reviewed in a few places, and made the New York Times bestseller list as noted above. It being the first book of the trilogy, and just recently released, I don't think we need an article on the trilogy itself. The article does need some sourcing, links to reviews where available. (Do note that VivianDarkbloom has been blocked for 48 hours for violations of WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL; also note that claims about Ringbark may be offset by his three-year participation history here.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony Fox (talk • contribs) 17:22, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
- Merge The Mortal Instruments Trilogy to Cassandra Clare. Delete City of Bones unelss a better article can be written. Rehevkor 18:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Trilogy to author article, Keep Book article, as it was NYT best seller.Mbisanz 22:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.