Jump to content

Talk:List of Ipswich Town F.C. seasons

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 193.82.16.50 (talk) at 09:27, 18 September 2007 (Blanks: first rsp). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFootball Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This template must be substituted. Replace {{FLC ...}} with {{subst:FLC ...}}.

Charity Shield

As this is a fairly innocuous competition rarely competed for by ITFC, I suggest it's removed from the main list and added either as footnotes or as a separate section (or both). --Dweller 11:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(As done for Texaco Trophy) --Dweller 11:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanks

I think people would expect to find no unexplained blanks in the professional era list. How about shading for ineligibility or (in the case of the League Cup) not applicable? On the same theme, I'd expect to see top scorer for every pro season completed and a "not known" or similar for the amateur seasons. --Dweller 11:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did add a note to the footnote to the effect that if no scorer was mentioned, none was known. Would you prefer I explicitly added not known to each empty row? 193.82.16.50 09:27, 18 September 2007 (UTC) (easyCafe Rambler)[reply]

Fair play

Needs a little further explanation, or (better) a wikilink. --Dweller 11:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Footnote 7

I noticed this was positioned inconsistently with footnote 8. Then I read 7, and it struck me that if all results were annulled, they shouldn't be included in the list. I'd replace with n/a (as with footnote 8) and place the annulled stats in the footnote. --Dweller 11:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

His achievement (league top scorer) needs its own citation. It also brings to light a pedantic problem - to date, ITFC have only once had a league top scorer (it seems) so the wording in the lead (pluralised) needs some attention. It may also be overcooking it to have a specific legend annotation for something that happened once. Better just to specifically refer to the instance in the lead text (as it's so notable) or just footnote it, and not bother with the bolding unless and until it happens again. Let's hope that's a very very long wait, lol. --Dweller 11:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Despite the fact I'm editing from my spiritual home (The apple store on Regent Street), I'll play along..! I'll footnote it, or better still, you can do it for me. I trust you, despite the woeful happenings of the past footballing weekend....! More soon. The Rambling Man 19:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and at least it happened once...! The Rambling Man 19:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]