Honestly, I'd personally just rather leave it deleted unless someone tries to DRV it. I certainly have my suspicions about some of the contributors there, but without proof I'd rather just leave it in the covered bin. If consensus is to restore I certainly won't stand in the way.--Isotope23talk12:44, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was looking at that this morning... I can't figure out what it is. What is this little organization they think they've started, and what is its purpose? I'm deeply puzzled by it. I'd really like to have someone who speaks ... er... Asian translate the characters on this template, too. I ran "fung suo" through babelfish as Chinese and got nothing. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs)13:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The abridged version... some editors decided to start a group that was part WP:CVU, part WP:EA, and part WP:AMA. The pages were tagged and deleted after an MFD. This editor appears to have offered "his space" so they can restart it. To be clear, the 2 individuals who started the group have grokked that it is time to walk away. Later additions seem to have not gotten this yet. Regardless, while sandboxes are acceptable, this looks more like a dumping ground for stuff that has been deleted elsewhere doesn't it?--Isotope23talk13:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted the "restart" per G4... I'm more trying to decide what to do with the bridge toll (?) information page and just the general idea of a storage "free host". Oh, and you could always ask Husond (talk·contribs) what the Kanji mean since he created the images... I only recognize a handful and those are not ones I know.--Isotope23talk13:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's not as if I was going to start using it or anything... but I'd hate to think of anyone using a template that says "fuck you vandal scum" in Chinese along the sides. For example. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs)15:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Queenie, I rv'd the troll that hit your user page and was going to block him, but you beat me to it. You were too nice to him, he deserved indef for a vandal only acct, not one year. I'm sorry he harrassed you. On a lighter note, your comments to these guys are hilarious.Rlevse15:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My attitude toward trolls is- they're teenagers. This guy is a troll at 15... at 16, he might well be ready to become an editor. That's why I tend toward one-year rather than indef blocks for trolling children... but I'm not that married to my theory, either. This poor kid just made a factual error, after all. I'm not a fag, I'm a dyke. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs)15:35, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
ROFL! I literally almost fell out of my chair at that one! While you seem quite capable of taking care of yourself, you let me know if you ever need help.Rlevse15:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have been on Nas talk...please check...you denied my request because you found no evidence that I was on the discussion but there i am..sosa..samil20...before blocking me you should block the other person as well because he was just as engaged in edit warring as I was....keep it up and I will file a grievance.- Sosa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.110.88.240 (talk) 21:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In general, Samil20, it's a good idea not to log off to make comments, because unsigned comments from an anonymous IP can be confusing for users. You are welcome to file a grievance against me- the appropriate place to do it is at the administrators' noticeboard- but I think you'll find that you won't get much sympathy, since my comment was phrased as a polite and reasonable question about whether you want to enter immediately into the same edit conflict that you were so recently blocked over. You can, of course, but I'd hate to see you blocked for edit-warring again. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs)22:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
