Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westside Church

The article has no secondary sources to show notability. Alksub 21:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:N. STORMTRACKER 94 21:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Borderline WP:SPAM article about a non-notable church. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 01:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not www.westsidechurch.com.au. Stifle (talk) 21:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see anything significant here. Whists I have no idea what figures for Australian churches are, 300 members is barely above one standard deviations above the norm in the US. No third party sources.jonathon 23:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 01:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a contested PROD. Comments about the PROD notice can be found here. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 01:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable due to lack of coverage. Sole reference is a directory listing. Nuttah68 19:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete I've spent ages on this. I've provided a reference even though I don't think an article must have an INTERNET article available on the web for it to be considered notable enough. I've put a lot of work into it and believe I tried to make it as fair and balanced as possible with no promotion or propoganda within it whatsoever. Don't be mean guys, Spillon 00:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]