Jump to content

European Union citizenship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dubitante (talk | contribs) at 12:04, 24 November 2007 (→History: further clarification about Denmark's so-called 'opt-out'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Citizenship of the Union was introduced by the Maastricht Treaty signed in 1992. It exists alongside national citizenship and provides additional rights to nationals of European Union Member States.

History

Prior to the Maastricht Treaty (1992), the European Communities treaties provided guarantees for the free movement of economically active persons, but not, generally, for others. The Treaty of Paris (1951)[1] establishing the European Coal and Steel Community established a right to free movement for workers in these industries and the Treaty of Rome (1957)[2] provided for the free movement of workers and services.

However, the Treaty provisions were interpreted by the European Court of Justice not as having a narrow economic purpose, but rather a wider social and economic purpose.[3] In Levin[4], the Court found that the "freedom to take up employment was important, not just as a means towards he creation of a single market for the benefit of the Member State economies, but as a right for the worker to raise her or his standard of living"[3]. Under the ECJ caselaw, the rights of free movement of workers applies regardless of the worker's purpose in taking up employment abroad[4], to both part-time and full-time work[4], and whether or not the worker required additional financial assistance from the Member State into which he moves[5]. Since, the ECJ has held[6] that a recipient of service has free movement rights under the treaty and this criterion is easily fulfilled [7], effectively every national of an EU country within another Member State, whether economically active or not, had a right under Article 12 of the European Community Treaty to non-discrimination even prior to the Maastricht Treaty.[8].

The concept of EU citizenship as a distinct concept was first introduced by the Maastricht Treaty, and was extended by the Treaty of Amsterdam. The Treaty of Amsterdam stated that union citizenship will not replace national citizenship, but only supplement it.[9]

In Martinez Sala[10], the ECJ held that the citizenship provisions provided substantive free movement rights in addition to those already granted by Community law.

Who is an EU citizen?

Article 17 (1) of the amended EC Treaty[11] states that

Citizenship of the Union is hereby established. Every person holding the nationality of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Union. Citizenship of the Union shall complement and not replace national citizenship.

All nationals of Member States are citizens of the unions. "It is for each Member State, having due regard to Community law, to lay down the conditions for the acquisition and loss of nationality." [12]

Rights of EU citizens

Specific rights

EU member states use a common passport design, burgundy coloured with the name of the member state, national seal and the title "European Union" (or its translation).

The amended EC Treaty[11] provides the following rights to EU citizens:

  • a right not to be discriminated against on grounds of nationality within the scope of application of the Treaty (Article 12);
  • the right of free movement and residence throughout the Union and the right to apply to work in any position (including national civil services with the exception of sensitive positions such as defence) (Article 18);
  • the right to vote and the right to stand in local and European elections in any Member State, other than the citizen's own, under the same conditions as the nationals of that state (Article 19);
  • the right to protection by the diplomatic or consular authorities of other Member States when in a non-EU Member State, if there are no diplomatic or consular authorities from the citizen's own state (Article 20);
  • the right to petition the European Parliament and the right to apply to the European Ombudsman in order to bring to his attention any cases of poor administration by the Community institutions and bodies, with the exception of the legal bodies (Article 21);
  • the right to apply to the European institutions in one of the official languages and to receive a reply in that same language (Article 21); and
  • a right of access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (Article 255).

The right to residence for nationals of the two most recent EU members (Romania and Bulgaria) may be limited. However, such limitations can only be imposed in the seven years following those countries' accession, i.e. until the end of 2013.

Article 18 Free Movement Rights

Article 18 (1) of the amended EC Treaty[11] states that

Every citizen of the Union shall have the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in this Treaty and by the measures adopted to give it effect.

Advocate General Kokott has remarked that,

The right of Union citizens to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States has developed into a new fundamental freedom.[13]

The ECJ has held that this Article confers a directly effective right upon citizens to reside in another Member State.[14][15] Before Baumbast[15], it was widely assumed that non-economically active citizens had no rights to residence deriving directly from the EC Treaty, only from directives created under the Treaty. In Baumbast, however, the ECJ held that Article 18 of the Treaty granted a generally applicable right to residency, which was limited by secondary legislation, but only where that secondary legislation was proportionate. Member States can distinguish between nationals and Union citizens but only if the provisions satisfy the test of proportionality.[16] Migrant EU citizens have a "legitimate expectation of a limited degree of financial solidarity... having regard to their degree of integration into the host society"[17] Length of time is a particularly important factor when considering the degree of integration.

The ECJ's case law on citizenship has been criticised for subjecting an increasing number of national rules of the proportionality assessment[16]

Citizens Rights Directive

Much of the existing secondary legislation and case law was consolidated in the Citizens' Rights Directive 2006.[18]

See also

Further reading

  • Maas, Willem (2007). Creating European Citizens. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-5485-6; ISBN 978-0-7425-5486-3 (paperback).
  • Meehan, Elizabeth (1993). Citizenship and the European Community. London: Sage. ISBN 978-0-8039-8429-5.
  • O'Leary, Síofra (1996). The Evolving Concept of Community Citizenship. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. ISBN 978-9-0411-0878-4.
  • Wiener, Antje (1998). 'European' Citizenship Practice: Building Institutions of a Non-State. Boulder: Westview Press. ISBN 0-8133-3689-9.

References

  1. ^ Article 69.
  2. ^ Title 3.
  3. ^ a b Craig, P., de Búrca, G. (2003). EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials (3rd Edition ed.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 706–711. ISBN 0-19-925608-X. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ a b c Case 53/81 D.M. Levin v Staatssecretaris van Justitie.
  5. ^ Case 139/85 R. H. Kempf v Staatssecretaris van Justitie.
  6. ^ Joined cases 286/82 and 26/83 Graziana Luisi and Giuseppe Carbone v Ministero del Tesoro.
  7. ^ Case 186/87 Ian William Cowan v Trésor public.
  8. ^ Advocate General Jacobs' Opinion in Case C-274/96 Criminal proceedings against Horst Otto Bickel and Ulrich Franz at paragraph [19].
  9. ^ This rendered the provision to the same effect in Protocol no. 5 on the position of Denmark in the Treaty on the European Union superfluous. See http://www.denmark.dk/en/menu/AboutDenmark/GovernmentPolitics/DenmarkAndTheEU/TheDanishOptouts/
  10. ^ Case C-85/96 María Martínez Sala v Freistaat Bayern.
  11. ^ a b c Treaty of Rome (consolidated version)
  12. ^ Case C-396/90 Micheletti v. Delegación del Gobierno en Cantabria, which established that dual-nationals of a Member State and a non-Member State were entitled to freedom of movement; case C-192/99 R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p. Manjit Kaur. It is not an abuse of process to acquire nationality in a Member State solely to take advantage of free movement rights in other Member States: case C-200/02 Kunqian Catherine Zhu and Man Lavette Chen v Secretary of State for the Home Department.
  13. ^ Durham European Law Institute, European Law Lecture 2005
  14. ^ Case C-184/99 Rudy Grzelczyk v Centre public d'aide sociale d'Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve.
  15. ^ a b Case C-413/99 Baumbast and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, para. [85]-[91].
  16. ^ a b European Union Law (5th Edition ed.). Sweet & Maxwell. 2006. ISBN 978-0421925601. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  17. ^ "The constitutional dimension to the case law on Union citizenship". European Law Review. 31 (5): 613–641. 2006. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help). See also Case C-209/03 R (Dany Bidar) v. London Borough of Ealing and Secretary of State for Education and Skills, para. [56]-[59].
  18. ^ Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.


Template:European Union-related topics

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=European_Union_citizenship&oldid=173461366"