Jump to content

User talk:Bencherlite

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Christine118500 (talk | contribs) at 08:20, 30 November 2007 (→‎Please!!!!!!!!!: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

  • I am a administrator which means I have access to certain functions to help maintain the encyclopedia, including the ability to delete or protect pages. If you are here to ask me why I deleted an article that you wrote, or an image that you uploaded, please check the reason that I gave when deleting it and read the speedy deletion criteria to see what the problem is. If you still disagree, please explain (politely, of course!) why you think I applied the wrong criteria, and I'll take another look.
  • I will reply on your talk page to messages you leave for me here, unless you tell me otherwise. Please click on the "+" at the top of the page to leave a message on a new topic, or "edit" to carry on an existing discussion. Thanks.
  • I have a legitimate second account - Bencherlite (AWB) - to keep my AWB editing separate from my main editing.

Rhombus (band)

You deleted the page 'Rhombus (band)' after it was flagged for deletion. The page provided information about the UK goth rock band, Rhombus - including a brief edited description (i didn't get chance to add much more information before it was removed!!), a list of band members and a brief discography.

I'm not sure what part of this information warrants deletion, as i was basing (or was at least beginning to base) the layout on other pages that already exist for similar bands.

Sodium uk (talk) 18:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. Thanks but you've protected the wrong version! He's still got his filth spewing from my mouth. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 01:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's better. Thanks again. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 01:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you un admin rouge Thanks again. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 02:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tickled pink, but not rouge. And for defending my reputation, you get a

Bye Bye MIss Goodnight (FILM) Poster deletion

Hi

I am from the film company Oslo Beach Films. Why is it that the poster for our film Bye Bye MIss Goodnight keeps being deleted, we have stated that WE ourselves are donating the image and that anyone with a Problem should contact us.

our details can be found at oslobeach.com

Please explain.

Regards

Sven —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.209.160.250 (talk) 10:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted Bposter.jpg under this speedy deletion criterion, namely that it had been uploaded "for non-commercial use only", "non-derivative use" or "used with permission", with no assertion of fair use. You are welcome to re-upload the file with the correct licence, and then provide the appropriate free-use rationale as appropriate. See WP:FAIR and WP:FURG. BencherliteTalk 11:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

Thank you for your adoption. Nothing that I need to ask now. Always nice to have someone rather than the help desk.Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 01:15, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added my name to your user page. I hope this is ok with you. Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 17:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC) I also saw your list of other adoptees. One of them has a similar name to someone who misbehaved on wikipedia, if I recall correctly. I'll AGF and not make accusations. Easter eggs for everyone if possible is my motto.Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 17:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed you. Sorry for the delay. Shalom (HelloPeace) 23:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Lizz Robbins

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Lizz Robbins. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Knicksfan4ever (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is it inappropriate?--STX 01:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If its inaccurate why does it happen? Why was my hook unilaterally removed, not archived, not marked, nor given a DYK notice on my talk page when it was in fact on the main page? --STX 01:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If its inaccurate why did an administrator remove it from the main page and then replace it with his own?--STX 01:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion of User:Etheltrust.....

Hi, to my understanding, userpages still fall under speedy criteria due to the fact that they are still classified as a main space, per here and here. Please correct me if i am wrong. Cheers. Tiptoety (talk) 01:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also take a look at this convo i had with another admin. Tiptoety (talk) 01:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
By creating and AN/I thread it was not meant to attack you in anyway, or to say you were wrong. I simply wanted to bring up the topic to the community in general, as per policy it was in violation, what was said on AN/I i respect and will fallow. I hope that i did not inconvenience you by creating a thread. Tiptoety (talk) 02:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found this interesting.....just on this topic...User:Lilsweetie07 11. Tiptoety (talk) 00:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, cause i was getting really confused. Thank you! Tiptoety (talk) 00:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oppose ???

did that on 4 RfA's. Two people left messages on his talk. Dlohcierekim 15:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nuked image, fixed and I hope I did it right.

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I *think* I did it right this time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_X#Live_X_10_-_Recently_and_Relived

Let me know if I messed it up again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fryfrog (talkcontribs) 15:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "Hero Envy" Wikipedia Page

Could you provide me a good explanation on why there is a list of internet television shows on your site with links to pages such as "Chad Vader","Break a leg" and numerous others. They are webisodes just like ours but still exist on your site.

I understand the whole not promoting yourself or sites but i'm scratching my head as to why those pages exist when they are the exact same thing as us.

Thanks for your time Keith —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.211.154.94 (talk) 19:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replying here as the message was from an IP and there's no guarantee the IP will see it otherwise. Wikipedia isn't perfect and the fact that other pages that shouldn't exist haven't been deleted isn't a valid reason for retaining another article. See WP:WAX. BencherliteTalk 20:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spiffier triple crown, new awards available

The standard triple crown.

Hi, I've been sprucing up the triple crown awards. Here's the new version of the standard triple crown you've already earned. Feel free to replace your old one with this if you like the new version better. I've also introduced two new triple crown awards for editors who've done a lot of triple crown work: the Napoleonic and Alexander the Great edition awards. If you're active in a WikiProject, check out the new offer for custom WikiProject triple crowns. I'll make those upon request if five or more editors qualify. See User:Durova/Triple crown winner's circle for more information. Thanks for your hard work, and cheers! DurovaCharge! 22:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD

Yes I did tag that speedy a bit quick. I thought an Admin would wait the four days but it was gone in like five minutes! I didn't check the Deletion log so I don't know who deleted it? I tell you what. How about we recreate the page (empty of course) wait four days and then get it deleted? LOL, just kidding :-) Your right about the bot. Would have made the job much easier. It was fun though and I enjoyed myself doing it. I'm new around here and it's interesting learning how to do things. Leaving stuff for others to do doesn't let me learn how things work. I like it here but I'm wondering if I'm anal retentive enough? I do know one thing though. What I've done with the domesticated pigeon bred categories etc is the right thing to do. This is an area I am experienced in have been a pigeon fancier for many years. Wikipedia needs editors with the kind of hands on experience I have in my subject. Just like it needs people like you experienced with what it is you do. I'm still learning and appreciate getting cut a little slack at times. I am looking more into Wikipedia policy as I go. I'll be sure to better familiarize myself with CfD. Cheers, Sting_au Talk 07:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Public Ivy category

Thanks for deleting the cat and pitching in on the removal! I'm on a Mac and can't do AWB, so it's great to have the help of an AWB-endowed user. I'll let you know if it needs salt. szyslak 23:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Closing request

This message has been addressed to you because you happened to be around at the time. I've sworn not to close fiction AfD's, and will likely get yelled at even if I do so purely on procedural grounds. It's on the latter that I ask you to speedily end Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Warcraft characters (2nd nomination) if that's in accordance with your own judgement. The delay between nomination and renomination is smaller than I've ever seen it approved to be after a single-article nc, and that's not the kind of behavior we can permit if we don't want the encyclopedia - or at the very least its coverage of fiction - to tear itself apart under internal strife in a couple of years. --Kizor (talk) 00:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. --Kizor (talk) 01:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question for you. This guy's user page is jsut about the same as the article he created that got deleted. Can we wipe out the page contents? Whats the policy on that? Thanks! --ShakataGaNai (talk) 08:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please!!!!!!!!!

Please adopt me again. I won't be bad EVER again! PLEASE, you can't just disown me like this. Give me one more chance, I beg you. PLEASE, just one more chance.Christine118500 (talk) 08:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]