User talk:Jinxmchue

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Jinxmchue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

31 hours after 14:17 on November 30 is 21:17 on December 1. Other than responding to very serious, baseless accusations by FeloniousMonk, my first non-user talk edit was this: 22:24, December 1, 2007 Talk:D. James Kennedy

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=31 hours after 14:17 on November 30 is 21:17 on December 1. Other than responding to very serious, baseless accusations by FeloniousMonk, my first non-user talk edit was this: 22:24, December 1, 2007 Talk:D. James Kennedy |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=31 hours after 14:17 on November 30 is 21:17 on December 1. Other than responding to very serious, baseless accusations by FeloniousMonk, my first non-user talk edit was this: 22:24, December 1, 2007 Talk:D. James Kennedy |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=31 hours after 14:17 on November 30 is 21:17 on December 1. Other than responding to very serious, baseless accusations by FeloniousMonk, my first non-user talk edit was this: 22:24, December 1, 2007 Talk:D. James Kennedy |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jinxmchue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Previous block period had ended. This is nothing more than a biased attack against me.

Decline reason:

13:17, 30 November 2007 Adam Cuerden blocked "67.135.49.177 with an expiry time of 31 hours Block appeared to be still in place while you were editing with this account, and you were warned here previously [1], which you ignored and deleted:[2]‎ — FeloniousMonk 05:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.