User talk:65.169.151.18

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Verifiability. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Zerida 19:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If all my constructive work hadn't been destroyed by malintentioned folks marking decent articles as Uninteresting - delete (using whatever term of choice they had pulled out of a non-applicable hat (notability, spam, etc.)), I may not have been driven to commenting in actual article text the way I do. But since I see how much my efforts rate around here, and the real truth behind the new class society created by Wikipedia, I have no strong impetus to continuing in meaningful edits until the culture has changed to benefit humanity as a whole by the expansion, and not the elimination, of knowledge.

I don't believe edits such as this one are "constructive" or an "expansion of knowledge". Neither is your recent edit to the policy page. You appear to have made other edits that were not reverted, because they were correcting spelling and grammatical mistakes. Please continue to make edits that actually benefit Wikipedia and they will not be reverted. — Zerida 21:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, indents, a handy tool. The Eiffel_Tower edit was definitely not me, even though it was from this IP... Anyhow, I used to put a lot of effort into doing small improvements to pages, and such, until a number of pages I contributed to dissappeared for various "reasons". I put "reasons" in quotes, because the process and effect of what was done is not reasonable, by any rational definition.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.