Jump to content

User talk:JayEffage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 192.68.211.173 (talk) at 10:18, 12 December 2007 (Please be civil). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hi JayEffage! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! WLU 18:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-oxidants

Hi Jay, a certain editor is reverting edits regarding anti-oxidants in CFS on spurious grounds. Firstly as unreliable source here which I had overturned on the WP RSN here, and now as Fringe theory, which I sure could be easily overturned, as the hypothesis is and in some cases has been tested. Rather than continue his edit war I have posted a Discussion on anti-oxidants and seek a consensus on the Talk page for an replacement section. Jagra 03:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please be civil

Personal attacks have no place in wikipedia. Please do not call my comments "drivel" just because I don't immediately provide references for everything I say. This is a personal attack, and is not appropriate for wikipedia. If you apologise for these insults and agree to be civil, I will also make more of an effort to be nice to you and will post references for anything you want. Deal? --Sciencewatcher (talk) 20:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been asked countless times to provide references for your ridiculous claims ("CFS=Brunout", "Lot's of autopsies") which you never did, independently from the tone in which they were asked. Answer those, then I will come up with new ones.
As for the civility: As you called my commentaries "bitching" for apparently strongly diagreeing with you POV, I think you should spare me the lecture about civility, "sciencewatcher".192.68.211.173 (talk) 10:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]