Jump to content

Talk:Uruguay Round

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 130.15.161.187 (talk) at 21:59, 13 December 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconInternational relations: United Nations Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

I have basically made this page completely by myself. Hope you like it, whoever reads this!

Typo

What's "righ" supposed to be in this sentence:

One aspect of this criticism is that figures very close to righ country industries — such as former Cargill executive Dan Amstutz — had a major role in the drafting of Uruguay Round language on agriculture and other matters.

Right? High? What is it? - DNewhall 20:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

This really needs citations. I would like to see where it is Oxfam International has criticized the round. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Agentgreen004 (talkcontribs) 06:02, 10 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]