User talk:Lradrama

Hello and welcome to my talk page. Please put new comments at the bottom, and click the + sign next to the 'edit this page' option at the top of your screen. I will reply to all messages on your talk page, whilst keeping a copy of my reply here, to keep the discussion together as well.

This is Lradrama's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Lradrama is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

/Archive 1, /Archive 2, /Archive 3, /Archive 4

Hello Lradrama

Thanks for your welcome to me.

Can I ask a question here?... Well, I ask, I hope so.

Please if you want: Can you check MY FIRST ARTICLE??

Well, my question is: I have not information about the accomplices of Iqbal. But can I create an article with:

Mamad Nadeem: was a 15 years old Pakistani accomplice of the serial killer Javed Iqbal..... ????

Well, thanks again Lradrama.!!!!!!!!!!

You are the only one who have patience with me.!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ahmed987147 (talk) 21:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have only a tiny bit of information about this accomplice, then it might not be worth starting a whole new article on it, if all it will ever be is a stub. How about you insert this information about his accomplices into the article about Javed Iqbal? You could create a section with a name along the lines of Accomplices or something like that. That's bets if not much information is at hand at the present time. If you know lots of facts about Mamad Nadeem, and can find article on external internet sites to back up your claims, then by all means start the article. Do a Google search and see what you can find! Please reply if you don't understand or wish me to make things clearer or if you want any help at all. Happy editing! Lra drama 13:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks English friend!, really thanks, you are my helper :P. I'm ashamed but I must ask again .... Forgive me :P and thanks again.

Can I put an Iqbal's picture from Google?. Anyone picture? Or... what must I do? Thanks again... millions thanks.... really thanks. God Bless you and thanks and forgive me ...kisses! Ahmed987147 (talk) 19:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha don't worry about asking questions! It's fine, no worries at all! :-) If you are to upload a picture of Iqbal, it must a picture that you own, i.e. no-one elses. Therefore, any image taken from something like Google will end up being deleted I'm afraid to say. I'm sorry about that. Do you have any of your own pictures of Iqbal? If so, by all means upload them and put them on the article. With love and regards, Lra drama 18:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks! I do understand but I'm Israeli, I'm not Pakistani, so, I never met Iqbal. How can I do that an Iqbal's picture can be me? . Thanks My New Friend! Oh.... I want to say to you.... I'm not an Iqbal's fan hahaha. I'm not a sick, I'm only creating his article but I condemn his acts and I hope that Iqbal, Ahmad, Nadeem and Sabir rot in the hell. I have a little niece and I hate these people. Well, thanks friend! Ahmed987147 (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never suggested you were a fan of Iqbal, and I understand that murder cases are of interest to many people, don't you worry! If you don't own a picture of him, then you may get one from the internet as long as you state the source from which you retrieved the image so it isn't deleted. Look at this example. The source and licencng details are both listed and you'll need to do the same for images you want to use. Ask if you need help. :-) Lra drama 15:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my friend, well, I found much information about Sajid Ahmad (An Iqbal's accomplice) but this information is in Spanish. I used a translator to it. So, what must I do? Thanks my helper friend, God Bless you Ahmed987147 (talk) 17:26, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You must put information onto Wikipedia into your own words. Do not just copy and paste it in as it violates copyright and the text will be deleted. Read what you have, and enjoy entering the information into the article in your own words - that way it'll all be your own work! It'll be something to be proud of. ;-) Lra drama 09:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course!, I created the Iqbal's article without copy past!, I created the Iqbal's article with my words. But my question is: If I found information in Spanish. Can I use it and put the pages in 'References' ?? Thanks friend. It's your largest talk hahaha. My doubts.... hahahahahaha. You are popular in WIKIPEDIA! Ahmed987147 (talk) 17:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you not find a translation of the site? Because a link from an English encyclopedia to a Spanish site may be inappropriate for those who can't understand Spanish? I'd suggest using a translation of the site, or a similar one written in English. Bear in mind the majority of British users of this website will know little or no Spanish. Many thanks, Lra drama 17:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again friend!. I have a question. I will put an Iqbal's picture. Is it the procedure?: I have an Iqbal's picture from Google. I will cut out parts of the image. After, I will put the image that I had cut. Is it OK?... Thanks and Merry December !. Ahmed987147 17:04, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you say from where you got the picture and to whom its rights belong, yes. Lra drama 18:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend! I have a question about copyright. Can you help me?. I hope so. This image was taken in 1988... so. Is its copyright expired? Image. Thanks friend. The image is from Spain and I do not know the Spanish laws about copyright. Ahmed987147 (talk) 22:13, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. No, its copyright will not have expired. You may still use it, as long as you say from where you obtained the picture and who it's from. Find as many as you can, and the ones which are most reliably backed up and say who took them and where they're from, etc are best to use. :-) Lra drama 20:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lra, I promise that it will be my last question but I want to know if this picture's license is ok. Here ...is it license ok? I think so but I found the picture on a page that the license is Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 SPAIN and the license that I have put here is Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 because on Wikipedia doesn't exist the Spanish license... so.. Is it OK or not? Millions of thanks. Ahmed987147 (talk) 20:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see the picture. Something went wrong. Click on the link again and you'll see what I mean. Lra drama 17:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talkheader

Hi, I saw you added a lot of Talkheader templates to talk pages. It is not necessary to do that for every article though, only when it is needed. See also this discussion. Garion96 (talk) 22:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've read the discussion, and the point you made, both of which I found quite interesting. I would have thought that the talkheader is necessary on all talkpages for the simple reason being that it is so useful to newcomers. When I first started out on Wikipedia, it was the talkheader template that told me how to sign my comments and how to use the page properly. I hate to think of the clangers I would have made had I not seen that earlier. If adding lots of talkheader templates is going to darken my image, I will indeed stop, but what are your views on this? Lra drama 12:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion is perhaps a bit extreme on this. I prefer to read discussions on discussion pages. It used to be that when there was a blue link I knew there was a discussion. Now when there is a blue link you have a 99% chance that it is only full of templates. Besides my personal preference, consensus seems to be to not over use this template but only use it when it is needed. Garion96 (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fair point. I'll be a bit more conservative with them in the future. :-) Thanks for raising your views on the issue. Lra drama 12:41, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hi there! Just a quick note to say "thanks very much" for your support on my recent, successful RfA. I'm humbled by the support I received, and will do my best to use the tools with care and for the benefit of the encyclopedia. Cheers! Tony Fox (arf!) 05:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome! I'm glad to hear of your success. Keep up the good work. :-) Lra drama 12:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit in Confessing Church-article

I have inserted "Pfarrernotbund" into the article because this organization was kind of the forerunner of the Confessing Church which was founded with the Barmen Declaration - not earlier. I don't know if there is an English translation of "Pfarrernotbund" so I've chosen the German name. An article with this name could be moved later if there is actually an English translation.84.167.165.228 (talk) 19:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]