Talk:Direct inward dial

I vote for them to be merged. --ORBIT 21:26, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Bookandcoffee 01:24, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Authentication methods

Why is this page under Category:Authentication methods?--agr 23:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sellers

Should all SELLERS be removed, or allowed to remain as information relating to the article.

If no seller information is to be permitted, then the sub for SELLERS should be deleted also. 84.69.232.177 (talk) 18:57, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are confusing "information" with "external links". External links to sites that provide no information, but only aim to sell a product or service, should not be added, as explained in the external links policy. It is perfectly possible to provide information about what kind of company sells the product, as well as Wikilinks (that is, links to Wikipedia articles as opposed to external links) to companies. The heading "Sellers" should perhaps be changed to something else, the information should perhaps be expanded or removed, Wikilinks to other companies should perhaps be provided, and the existing Wikilinks may or may not be relevant - but the inappropriate links should not be re-introduced. This is not specific to this particular article, it's a general guideline that applies throughout Wikipedia. --Bonadea (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SELLERS

It is also agreed here that the seller information should either be completely removed from the article OR the seller links should remain, as after looking at each of the listed sellers here, all the sites have information relating to Direct Inward Dialling so therefore is both informative and relevant to this article.

It is also in my opinion that due to the activity over the past 3 or 4 days relating to Direct Inward Dialling, the links should remain AND that the article is locked to prevent changes until a final decision is reached in order to prevent the changes to be undone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.69.239.238 (talk) 14:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed all of the internal 'example' links, and the complete list of commercial external links. The links you have been continually adding are pure and simple spam, with no intent other than commercial promotion. Please reference the material that Bonadea has patiently provided you in the above section. Kuru ^talk 14:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The links you removed may or may not be promotional in the slightest, but since I have no direct connection to these promotional links it can not be seen as promotional there if this is the case, how many other pages have links to external websites for promotional purpose? 84.69.239.238 (talk) 16:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]