User talk:65.163.112.128

Your addition to WP:3O

Hey. I saw your post on the third opinion page, and I'm confused as to what your question is. Is the question about the inclusion of ufowatchdog.com on the pages? — HelloAnnyong [ t · c ] 22:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It is used to infer that pro paranormal people and investigators are conmen/conwomen while skeptics such as Philip Klass remains uncriticized, and when evidence is found, on the SAME site, it is not allowed. The evidence criticizing Philip Klass is on ufowatchdog.com, the "Hall of SHAME 1, 7th on that list. I and others have placed it, it gets removed, while ufowatchdog.com is used as evidence of criticizim of people who are pro paranormal, investigate paranormal matters, and that IS allowed to remain in their articles. Either allow evidence that UFO Watchdog to be used as criticizisim of skeptices, which it does as well as criticize pro paranormal people, investigators or remove it out of articles, such as Linda Howe and Richard C. Hoagland. 65.163.112.128 (talk) 02:25, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.