Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/AirFrance358

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser‎ | Case

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Orchis29 (talk | contribs) at 12:02, 28 January 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

AirFrance358

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 17:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

This is a violation of the "Parties reminded" remedy of the Arbcom case Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Liancourt Rocks. Revert-warring is occurring accross multiple articles, along nationalistic lines (Korea vs. Japan), and there appeared to be no civil discussion in the talk pages in most cases. (For the other side of the revert-war, see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/KoreanShoriSenyou and Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Amazonfire.) --Endroit (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is "the violation" done within your report? By your own standard from Japanese nationalistic party? I know you have been always suspected as a sockpuppet master by many people, so it is worth to include you in my report. So where are evidences that I'm the same person of Ecthelion83 and possible 3RR violation. You need to faithfully make differs on your suspected incidents, but no with this untidy mess. And why are you including yujacha article? It is rather much helpful for me to find out sockpuppetry of your party or you. As I see the old cases, I need to dig up the past reports on you as well. Cheers! --Appletrees (talk) 18:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Addition I suggested Endroit to make differs but he didn't. I think the inclusion of me appears to be arbitrary per Endroit's commnet at his talk page.[1]. He accused me of a sock of Ecthelion83 or banned user User:Appleby due to similar name. The case was actually irrelevant to Sea of Japan and AirFrance358.

I copy and paste these differs from 219.66.40.104 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)), 219.66.45.131 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))'s job who vandalized my report on Amazonefire. 4 times [2] [3]

1th rever 07:56, 7 January 2008 by Ecthelion83
2th rever 22:18, 7 January 2008 by Appletrees
3th rever 05:03, 8 January 2008 by Ecthelion83
4th rever 22:13, 8 January 2008 by Appletrees
5th rever 22:20, 8 January 2008 by Appletrees
6th rever 22:36, 8 January 2008 by Ecthelion83
7th rever 00:51, 9 January 2008 by Ecthelion83
8th rever 20:22, 10 January 2008 by Appletrees
9th rever 20:19, 14 January 2008 by Ecthelion83
10th rever 20:19, 14 January 2008 by Appletrees

Supposed that I'm a sock of the aforementioned people, the articles Endroit provides for evidences are just random and irrelevant from any possible violation on 3RR except Kofun period‎ article. So please check it. I hope everything becomes clear soon. --Appletrees (talk) 15:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • no Declined Evidence of collusion between Appletrees and Ecthelion83 is limited to two articles and one revert violation, so for now, insufficient basis to check. Thatcher 16:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't know what "meat-puppetry" has to do with those diffs. Obviously there are some deep divisions here, but as far as Appletrees and Ecthelion83 are concerned, one 3RR violation and two total articles with possible collusion is insufficient grounds to check/reveal private information. This can be re-opened if further instances of possible collusion occur. Thatcher 20:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment: Thatcher, why don't you just check on me as his request? I feel annoyed by this false accusation of causing edit warring. If he made diffs when to make this file as my advice, this file would be clear soon. I don't really mind being checked. But his accusation and chide is unbearable. Even though he thinks of someone suspicious, Endroit should not tag sockpupptry template before filing an official report. I don't know why my object to his ill-faith move is called "meat-puppetry". --Appletrees (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Possible that Appletrees (talk · contribs) and Ecthelion83 (talk · contribs) are related. Note that the overlap between the two accounts is minor and only recent, so if these accounts are the same person, then they just have to make sure not to overlap again. Of course, coincidence and synchronicity exist, and checkusers can't see through the pipe to really know who is at the other end. Thatcher 01:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Appletrees (talk · contribs) and Ecthelion83 (talk · contribs) have the word "JPOV" that only they use. These two accounts participated in the edit war of Azuchi-Momoyama period.Please confirm it.

Revert was repeated by these two accounts as for Nihon Shoki.

--Orchis29 (talk) 11:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/AirFrance358&oldid=187451556"