Jump to content

User talk:Blow of Light

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.38.98.233 (talk) at 15:10, 1 February 2008 (→‎Question?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Blow of Light's status: In da hood.

Due to personal issues, i will not be on wikipedia much for an indefinite period of time. (And, no, it has nothing to do with the topic ban.) BoL 06:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Via e-mail[reply]

Welcome to my talk page!
  • I will respond to messages here for sure. If I feel like rambling, you'll see it on your talk page.
  • If you want to attack me, be kind, and I'll be kind. If you want to be a dick anyway, fine, only make one. After that, you'll get these.
  • Please post new messages at the bottom. and sign your posts with 4 tildes: ~~~~ Any messages that do not comply with the rules will be disposed of properly unless you are not an autoconfirmed user.
  • Thank you!
Contacting me

help

thanks for all your help editing Battle of Mediolanum its been crap for like 2 years now and its really needed to be fixed. dont worry about htose guys over at the admin page their just trying to thelp just take their sugestions that sound good to you and do your own thing and try not to get blockedor sanctioned or something. yore a good editor and it hink that you are will just keep getting better and beter if you stay. Smith Jones (talk)

What personal analysis or commentary did I add? How is what I did vandalism? Oore (talk) 04:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You removed two categories, which Jmlk17 restored. And he didn't give a reason because you forgot to sign your comment, that's why. BoL 05:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have it wrong. Jmlk17 restored two categories (without explanation) that I deleted and gave an explanation for. It seems you guys like to bite the newbies. Oore (talk) 05:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 5 28 January 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: New feature 
Special: 2007 in Review, Part III Signpost interview: John Broughton 
New parser preprocessor introduced Best of WikiWorld: "Truthiness" 
News and notes: Estonian Wikipedia, Picture of the Year, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Tutorial: Reporting and dealing with vandals WikiProject Report: Molecular and Cellular Biology 
Wikipedia Dispatches: Banner year for Featured articles Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 5 28 January 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: New feature 
Special: 2007 in Review, Part III Signpost interview: John Broughton 
New parser preprocessor introduced Best of WikiWorld: "Truthiness" 
News and notes: Estonian Wikipedia, Picture of the Year, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Tutorial: Reporting and dealing with vandals WikiProject Report: Molecular and Cellular Biology 
Wikipedia Dispatches: Banner year for Featured articles Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

You're welcome. :d BoL 04:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain your coment ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 100%freehuman (talkcontribs) 05:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two questions

Hey ;) It's been a while since I was on your talk page, but I'm back to leave you a note containing two questions. First of all there is this user User talk:Kintetsubuffalo who seems to behave a little bit weird, at least in my understandings. I created the article about Ginty Vrede and I think unless it's a small article and English still isn't my native speaking language it's a pretty good one. For some reason this user gave it a "peacock terms" tag and I wasn't really able to find out why, so I left him a comment, asking what he meant and why he did it like that adding an ugly tag instead of just changing the parts he was talking about, specially when it's such a small article. Anyways, he didn't respond to me at all, but he did remove my text from his talk page, so I wrote him again and told him I was going to delete the tag. Again he removed my text without explanation. I think this is weird, but maybe it's just me, I don't know. Anyways, my question is, what do you suggest me to do with this person? My second question is, you created me an archive or something like that for my talk page, but it hasn't archived anything yet, so probably you made a mistake somewhere. Can you help me? Thanks, AmandaT/C 16:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at it. If he/she continues to ignore you, contact GlassCobra. He's an admin and I am not. BoL 00:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't really try to contact him anymore because he did not put the tag I was talking about back into the article after I removed it. I guess it's all fine this way, but if he does something weird again I will let you and GlassCobra know, thanks. AmandaT/C 08:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question?

Do you have any ideas for a balsa wood bridge presetations? It is urgent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.38.98.233 (talk) 19:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We have the bridge, all we need is an idea for how to present it.

Reply

If you were reading the Wikimedia-SF mailing list lately, you would know what's going on. I would let it go. —Kurykh 01:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really, but, yeah, if you're interested, do contact that user. BoL 01:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by 166.128.223.182

Greetings. I saw that you reverted edits by 166.128.223.182 as vandalism. They don't look like vandalism to me -- at worst, I would call them good-faith edits. But even more, I actually think he has a valid point that he explained pretty well in the edit summary. Regards, Mlouns (talk) 02:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize; I'm a bit too trigger happy with the rollback VANDAL button. :( BoL 04:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste move

Hi. Do not cut and paste articles to move them. Use the move button otherwise the edit history is lost in the move. I've fixed Fresh & Easy. Cheers. Mark83 (talk) 12:22, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]