Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 February 9
February 9
This appears to be a screenshot of a television program. I don't believe the uploader is the actual copyright holder in this case. Shell babelfish 00:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Another tv screenshot improperly released. Shell babelfish 00:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Another tv screenshot by same uploader as above. Shell babelfish 00:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Permission granted is only for use on Wikipedia according to remark on image description page. Nv8200p talk 01:57, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence permission was granted to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:14, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Watermarked with copyright information Nv8200p talk 02:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I contest deletion. Copyright status checked and lawful. Please ignore watermark. Fred Plotz (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- The legal basis for the pictures in question is § 17 UrhG (German copyright act); §§ 677, 185 II BGB (German civil code). I'm staff of the copyright holding organization and clarified the copyright status of the pictures - in the uploaded low-resolution version - personally with the authoritative press office of the university. Fred Plotz (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Watermarked with copyright information Nv8200p talk 02:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I contest deletion. Copyright status checked and lawful. Please ignore watermark. Fred Plotz (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- The legal basis for the pictures in question is § 17 UrhG (German copyright act); §§ 677, 185 II BGB (German civil code). I'm staff of the copyright holding organization and clarified the copyright status of the pictures - in the uploaded low-resolution version - personally with the authoritative press office of the university. Fred Plotz (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Watermarked with copyright information Nv8200p talk 02:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I contest deletion. Copyright status checked and lawful. Please ignore watermark. Fred Plotz (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- The legal basis for the pictures in question is § 17 UrhG (German copyright act); §§ 677, 185 II BGB (German civil code). I'm staff of the copyright holding organization and clarified the copyright status of the pictures - in the uploaded low-resolution version - personally with the authoritative press office of the university. Fred Plotz (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Watermarked with copyright information Nv8200p talk 02:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I contest deletion. Copyright status checked and lawful. Please ignore watermark. Fred Plotz (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- The legal basis for the pictures in question is § 17 UrhG (German copyright act); §§ 677, 185 II BGB (German civil code). I'm staff of the copyright holding organization and clarified the copyright status of the pictures - in the uploaded low-resolution version - personally with the authoritative press office of the university. Fred Plotz (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Watermarked with copyright information Nv8200p talk 02:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I contest deletion. Copyright status checked and lawful. Please ignore watermark. Fred Plotz (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- The legal basis for the pictures in question is § 17 UrhG (German copyright act); §§ 677, 185 II BGB (German civil code). I'm staff of the copyright holding organization and clarified the copyright status of the pictures - in the uploaded low-resolution version - personally with the authoritative press office of the university. Fred Plotz (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Watermarked with copyright information Nv8200p talk 02:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I contest deletion. Copyright status checked and lawful. Please ignore watermark. Fred Plotz (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- The legal basis for the pictures in question is § 17 UrhG (German copyright act); §§ 677, 185 II BGB (German civil code). I'm staff of the copyright holding organization and clarified the copyright status of the pictures - in the uploaded low-resolution version - personally with the authoritative press office of the university. Fred Plotz (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Watermarked with copyright information Nv8200p talk 02:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I contest deletion. Copyright status checked and lawful. Please ignore watermark. Fred Plotz (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- The legal basis for the pictures in question is § 17 UrhG (German copyright act); §§ 677, 185 II BGB (German civil code). I'm staff of the copyright holding organization and clarified the copyright status of the pictures - in the uploaded low-resolution version - personally with the authoritative press office of the university. Fred Plotz (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Where is the copyright policy or permission that releases the image under the GFDL and creative commons? -Nv8200p talk 01:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence permission was granted to release under the GFDL Nv8200p talk 02:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence uploader received permission to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 03:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
I've received permission from the creators of the 2008 CFC-YFC ILC poster for release proper in the GFDL. Cfcyfcsolid (talk) 23:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Promotional image with no evidence presented of permission to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot with watermarked logo Nv8200p talk 13:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
License does not grant release under the GFDL or CC Nv8200p talk 13:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
License does not grant release under the GFDL or CC Nv8200p talk 13:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence permission was granted to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence permission was granted to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence permisssion was granted to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence permission was granted to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 14:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Image is tagged as Creative Commons Non-Commercial on Flickr not GFDL. Nv8200p talk 14:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence permission was granted to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 14:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the image as claimed as photo author and presumed copyright holder is Kicki Nilsson. Nv8200p talk 15:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence permission was granted to release image under the GFDL. See WP:COPYREQ. Nv8200p talk 15:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence permission was granted to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 15:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I was given permission to use the photo by Grandmaster of Abir Yehoshua Sofer, who is one of the men in the picture. What kind of evidence do you need that he gave permission? His email address is yehoshua.sofer@gmail.com.--EhavEliyahu (talk) 04:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Claimed {{CopyrightedFreeUse-Link}}, with the justification "This is PD from the Turkish wikipedia: http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Wiles". First of all, Wikipedia itself cannot be a source for items on Wikipedia. Furthermore, the image on the Turkish Wikipedia (tr:Resim:Wiles.jpg) is tagged as being copyrighted and being used under a claim of fair use (compare tr:Şablon:Ekran Görüntüsü-TV and en:Template:Non-free television screenshot, though I read no Turkish). This is an image of a living person, so it cannot be used under a claim of fair use here on the English Wikipedia. As another note, this image had a previous {{PUIdisputed}} tag added by PDH on 15 March 2007, but apparently nothing was done about it at that time. —Bkell (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence permission was granted to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 15:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence permission was granted to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 16:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Looks like a screenshot. No evidene permission was granted to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 16:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence permission was granted to replease image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 16:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
At User_talk:Genisock2#Image_Clive_Anderson uploader stated they didn't know the source of the image Genisock2 (talk) 21:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
No evidence Lorne Resnisk franted permission to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 22:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
