User talk:Satyrblade 69

Image copyright problem with Image:Sooj 3.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Sooj 3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of S.J. Tucker

A tag has been placed on S.J. Tucker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:34, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read again the speedy deletion notice. You are supposed to be explaining on the talk page of the article you created why it should not be deleted but you should not remove the notice yourself. I added the {{hangon}} template for you so it won't get deleted yet. --Enric Naval (talk) 19:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank, Enrick. Read it. Moved article to a stub, which as far as I can see does not stipulate the same cirteria. Verfied references, supported artist's accomplishments: six albums, various appearances, collaborations in book and music media with various persons noted elsewhere in Wikipedia. As for the original notice, I Accidentally deleted it because it wasn't obvious from the tag what the notice was. Thanks for adding hangon. --Satyrblade 69

formatting of references

Regarding [1], you don't need to use <ref>* 1 something</ref> when making a reference. Just use <ref>something</ref>. The reference list auto-formats as a list and is auto-numbered by the wiki. --Enric Naval (talk) 19:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Enric. That wasn't obvious when I was formatting the article. --User:Satyrblade 69

Replaceable fair use Image:Sooj_wiki.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Sooj_wiki.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 19:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]