Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After.Life
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Coredesat (talk | contribs) at 06:09, 20 February 2008 (Closing debate; result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Coredesat 06:09, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Per the notability guidelines for future films, After.Life does not yet warrant existence because there are no reliable sources to show that it has begun production. According to Reuters, it was supposed to have begun filming in 2007. In addition, for those who wonder about the poster, it is merely a teaser poster released in February 2007 before production was intended to start, so this is not a sign that it will come out. I've done my best to look for verifiable coverage from reliable sources about the film being in production, but there are none. Even IMDb says the status of this film is "Unknown". No prejudice against recreation if sourcing can be found for the start of production. Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The notability guidelines for future films stipulate that a stand-alone article for a film should not be created until a project enters production. This is because many factors such as budget issues, scripting issues, and casting issues can interfere with the project. Indeed, this project has already been delayed and there's nothing to say it won't be again. The article can be recreated when principal photography is confirmed to have begun. Steve T • C 14:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keilana|Parlez ici 00:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as no WP:RS per WP:NFF. Sting au Buzz Me... 00:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:NFF. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Steve. Evan ¤ Seeds 04:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.